BlastPoint's Credit Union Scorecard
NORTH SHORE
Charter #18473 · MN
NORTH SHORE has 3 strengths but faces 8 concerns
Key Strengths
Areas where this CU excels compared to peers
- + Net Interest Margin 0.27% above tier average
- + Loan-to-Member Ratio (LMR): Top 9.4% in tier
- + Member Growth Rate: Top 10.0% in tier
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - Credit Risk Growth: Bottom 50.0% in tier
- - Efficiency Drag: Bottom 50.0% in tier
- - Liquidity Strain: Bottom 50.0% in tier
- - Credit Quality Pressure: Bottom 50.0% in tier
- - Shrinking Wallet Share: Bottom 50.0% in tier
- - Indirect Auto Dependency: Bottom 50.0% in tier
- - ROA 0.27% below tier average
- - Efficiency ratio 8.96% above tier (higher cost structure)
NEW · Q2 2026 RECAP
Your Quarter, Wrapped
A 35-second highlight reel of your Q2 2026 — the wins worth celebrating and the one signal worth watching, pulled straight from your scorecard data.
Q2 2026 at a glance
- One of 1,024 credit unions with $100M-$500M in assets nationally, and 1 of 31 that size in Minnesota.
- Shares and deposits +0.9% year over year ($247M in shares and deposits).
- Membership: 14,189 members, +4.7% vs a year ago.
- Delinquency rate 0.33%.
- Return on assets 0.60%.
- Efficiency ratio 85.69% vs a 76.73% peer average.
- Loan-to-share ratio 91.87% vs a 71.54% peer average.
Data period: Q2 2026 NCUA call report. Animation disabled (reduced-motion preference). Full details in the metrics table below.
Core Metrics
As of 2026-Q2
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (MN) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Members |
14,189
+4.7% YoY+1.5% QoQ
|
-979 |
15,168
-2.6% YoY
|
22,911
-12.6% YoY
|
34,678
+6.6% YoY
|
55% |
| Assets |
$284.8M
+1.6% YoY+1.1% QoQ
|
+$52.8M |
$232.0M
+0.7% YoY
|
$439.2M
-13.6% YoY
|
$593.1M
+10.2% YoY
|
71% |
| Loans |
$226.7M
+7.7% YoY+4.4% QoQ
|
+$80.4M |
$146.3M
+0.2% YoY
|
$304.0M
-16.2% YoY
|
$418.6M
+10.1% YoY
|
82% |
| Deposits |
$246.7M
+0.9% YoY+1.0% QoQ
|
+$46.0M |
$200.7M
+0.2% YoY
|
$366.9M
-12.4% YoY
|
$504.8M
+10.3% YoY
|
71% |
See Your Full Scorecard
Unlock complete metrics, rankings, and AI-powered insights — always free
✓ Check your email for the access link!
Want to see an example first? Preview Navy Federal's scorecard →
| ROA |
0.6%
+67.0% YoY+2.1% QoQ
|
-0.3% |
0.9%
+12.5% YoY
|
1.8%
-6.5% YoY
|
1.2%
+121.4% YoY
|
37% |
| NIM |
4.0%
+12.4% YoY-0.3% QoQ
|
+0.3% |
3.7%
+4.5% YoY
|
3.8%
+5.6% YoY
|
3.8%
+2.3% YoY
|
68% |
| Efficiency Ratio |
85.7%
-5.3% YoY-0.8% QoQ
|
+9.0% |
76.7%
-0.8% YoY
|
101.1%
+34.5% YoY
|
83.0%
-5.3% YoY
|
78% |
| Delinquency Rate |
0.3%
+24.6% YoY-48.3% QoQ
|
-0.6 |
0.9%
+6.6% YoY
|
1.0%
+6.0% YoY
|
1.3%
+2.6% YoY
|
21% |
| Loan To Share |
91.9%
+6.8% YoY+3.4% QoQ
|
+20.3% |
71.5%
-0.3% YoY
|
75.4%
-1.3% YoY
|
66.4%
-1.4% YoY
|
Top 11.3% in tier |
| AMR |
$33,365
-0.6% YoY+1.0% QoQ
|
+$8K |
$25,107
+3.2% YoY
|
$23,990
+3.7% YoY
|
$20,028
-0.9% YoY
|
Top 12.6% in tier |
| CD Concentration |
23.9%
-3.2% YoY-0.5% QoQ
|
-0.6% | 24.6% | 21.9% | 20.0% | 50% |
| Indirect Auto % |
15.4%
-20.1% YoY-8.6% QoQ
|
+1.8% | 13.6% | 6.4% | 7.7% | 50% |
Signature Analysis
Strengths (0)
Concerns (6)
Credit Risk Growth
riskLoan portfolio growing while delinquencies are rising. Expansion with deteriorating credit quality needs attention.
Efficiency Drag
riskHigh efficiency ratio (>80%) indicates elevated operating costs relative to revenue. Margin improvement opportunities may exist.
Liquidity Strain
riskLoan demand outpacing deposits. They're bumping against liquidity limits - need funding solutions.
Credit Quality Pressure
riskDelinquencies are rising year-over-year. Credit risk is building - they may need better underwriting tools.
Shrinking Wallet Share
declineAverage member relationship declining year-over-year. Members may be moving money elsewhere or reducing engagement.
Indirect Auto Dependency
riskSignificant portion of loan portfolio in indirect auto (>15%). This concentration creates dependency on dealer relationships.
Metric Rankings
See how this credit union ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.
Strengths: Metrics in the top 25% (75th percentile or higher) Concerns: Metrics in the bottom 25% (25th percentile or lower)