BlastPoint's Credit Union Scorecard
CHIPHONE
Charter #5422 · IN
CHIPHONE has 2 strengths but faces 8 concerns
Key Strengths
Areas where this CU excels compared to peers
- + Net Interest Margin 0.13% above tier average
- + Fee Income Per Member: Top 9.9% in tier
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - Stagnation Risk: Bottom 50.0% in tier
- - Liquidity Overhang: Bottom 50.0% in tier
- - Institutional Decline: Bottom 50.0% in tier
- - Membership Headwinds: Bottom 50.0% in tier
- - Shrinking Wallet Share: Bottom 50.0% in tier
- - Accelerating Exit Risk: Bottom 50.0% in tier
- - ROA 0.12% below tier average
- - Net Charge-Off Rate: Bottom 2.0% in tier
NEW · Q2 2026 RECAP
Your Quarter, Wrapped
A 35-second highlight reel of your Q2 2026 — the wins worth celebrating and the one signal worth watching, pulled straight from your scorecard data.
Q2 2026 at a glance
- One of 1,024 credit unions with $100M-$500M in assets nationally, and 1 of 21 that size in Indiana.
- Shares and deposits -0.9% year over year ($93.0M in shares and deposits).
- Membership: 8,873 members, -2.0% vs a year ago.
- Delinquency rate 0.38%.
- Return on assets 0.75%.
- Efficiency ratio 75.48% vs a 76.73% peer average.
- Loan-to-share ratio 43.26% vs a 71.54% peer average.
Data period: Q2 2026 NCUA call report. Animation disabled (reduced-motion preference). Full details in the metrics table below.
Core Metrics
As of 2026-Q2
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (IN) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Members |
8,873
-2.0% YoY-0.4% QoQ
|
-6.3K |
15,168
-2.6% YoY
|
23,392
+5.7% YoY
|
34,678
+6.6% YoY
|
24% |
| Assets |
$111.8M
-0.7% YoY-1.7% QoQ
|
$-120.2M |
$232.0M
+0.7% YoY
|
$404.4M
+8.2% YoY
|
$593.1M
+10.2% YoY
|
Bottom 8.0% in tier |
| Loans |
$40.2M
-8.8% YoY-2.3% QoQ
|
$-106.1M |
$146.3M
+0.2% YoY
|
$288.6M
+8.1% YoY
|
$418.6M
+10.1% YoY
|
Bottom 2.5% in tier |
| Deposits |
$93.0M
-0.9% YoY-2.2% QoQ
|
$-107.8M |
$200.7M
+0.2% YoY
|
$337.5M
+7.0% YoY
|
$504.8M
+10.3% YoY
|
Bottom 5.0% in tier |
See Your Full Scorecard
Unlock complete metrics, rankings, and AI-powered insights — always free
✓ Check your email for the access link!
Want to see an example first? Preview Navy Federal's scorecard →
| ROA |
0.7%
+10.9% YoY+33.0% QoQ
|
-0.1% |
0.9%
+12.5% YoY
|
1.6%
+105.9% YoY
|
1.2%
+121.4% YoY
|
49% |
| NIM |
3.8%
-2.8% YoY+2.5% QoQ
|
+0.1% |
3.7%
+4.5% YoY
|
3.9%
+3.1% YoY
|
3.8%
+2.3% YoY
|
59% |
| Efficiency Ratio |
75.5%
+1.6% YoY+0.4% QoQ
|
-1.3% |
76.7%
-0.8% YoY
|
105.3%
+31.6% YoY
|
83.0%
-5.3% YoY
|
43% |
| Delinquency Rate |
0.4%
-80.4% YoY+22.3% QoQ
|
-0.5 |
0.9%
+6.6% YoY
|
1.6%
+32.0% YoY
|
1.3%
+2.6% YoY
|
26% |
| Loan To Share |
43.3%
-7.9% YoY-0.1% QoQ
|
-28.3% |
71.5%
-0.3% YoY
|
68.6%
+0.4% YoY
|
66.4%
-1.4% YoY
|
Bottom 5.9% in tier |
| AMR |
$15,007
-1.5% YoY-1.9% QoQ
|
$-10K |
$25,107
+3.2% YoY
|
$18,349
+1.6% YoY
|
$20,028
-0.9% YoY
|
Bottom 9.0% in tier |
| CD Concentration |
13.3%
+8.5% YoY+3.2% QoQ
|
-11.2% | 24.6% | 19.4% | 20.0% | 50% |
| Indirect Auto % |
10.2%
-20.2% YoY-10.0% QoQ
|
-3.4% | 13.6% | 11.1% | 7.7% | 50% |
Signature Analysis
Strengths (0)
Concerns (6)
Stagnation Risk
riskMembership shrinking at least 0.5% year-over-year. Declining member base creates long-term risk even if current operations appear healthy.
Liquidity Overhang
riskExceptional capital position (>16%, top quartile). Strong fundamentals—opportunity to deploy capital more productively.
Institutional Decline
declineBoth members and loans declining - the institution is contracting. Leadership is likely under pressure to reverse course.
Membership Headwinds
declineMembership declining year-over-year. They need solutions to stop the bleeding before it impacts revenue.
Shrinking Wallet Share
declineAverage member relationship declining year-over-year. Members may be moving money elsewhere or reducing engagement.
Accelerating Exit Risk
declineMembers leaving AND taking more deposits with them. This compounds quickly - urgent need for retention strategy.
Metric Rankings
See how this credit union ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.
Strengths: Metrics in the top 25% (75th percentile or higher) Concerns: Metrics in the bottom 25% (25th percentile or lower)