BlastPoint's Credit Union Scorecard
ROUTE 31
Charter #5982 · MI
ROUTE 31 has 2 strengths but faces 8 concerns
Key Strengths
Areas where this CU excels compared to peers
- + Wallet Share Momentum: Top 50.0% in tier
- + Fee Income Per Member: Top 6.7% in tier
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - Indirect Auto Dependency: Bottom 50.0% in tier
- - Stagnation Risk: Bottom 50.0% in tier
- - Membership Headwinds: Bottom 50.0% in tier
- - Efficiency Drag: Bottom 50.0% in tier
- - Institutional Decline: Bottom 50.0% in tier
- - ROA 0.15% below tier average
- - Efficiency ratio 6.41% above tier (higher cost structure)
- - Member decline: -3.6% YoY
NEW · Q2 2026 RECAP
Your Quarter, Wrapped
A 35-second highlight reel of your Q2 2026 — the wins worth celebrating and the one signal worth watching, pulled straight from your scorecard data.
Q2 2026 at a glance
- One of 1,024 credit unions with $100M-$500M in assets nationally, and 1 of 68 that size in Michigan.
- Shares and deposits +7.3% year over year ($89.7M in shares and deposits).
- Membership: 9,479 members, -3.6% vs a year ago.
- Delinquency rate 0.41%.
- Return on assets 0.71%.
- Efficiency ratio 83.14% vs a 76.73% peer average.
- Loan-to-share ratio 68.79% vs a 71.54% peer average.
Data period: Q2 2026 NCUA call report. Animation disabled (reduced-motion preference). Full details in the metrics table below.
Core Metrics
As of 2026-Q2
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (MI) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Members |
9,479
-3.6% YoY+0.1% QoQ
|
-5.7K |
15,168
-2.6% YoY
|
36,289
+5.9% YoY
|
34,678
+6.6% YoY
|
29% |
| Assets |
$104.6M
+6.3% YoY+3.0% QoQ
|
$-127.4M |
$232.0M
+0.7% YoY
|
$717.2M
+13.9% YoY
|
$593.1M
+10.2% YoY
|
Bottom 2.8% in tier |
| Loans |
$61.7M
-4.8% YoY+0.7% QoQ
|
$-84.5M |
$146.3M
+0.2% YoY
|
$498.6M
+13.7% YoY
|
$418.6M
+10.1% YoY
|
Bottom 12.0% in tier |
| Deposits |
$89.7M
+7.3% YoY+3.7% QoQ
|
$-111.0M |
$200.7M
+0.2% YoY
|
$610.4M
+14.2% YoY
|
$504.8M
+10.3% YoY
|
Bottom 2.9% in tier |
See Your Full Scorecard
Unlock complete metrics, rankings, and AI-powered insights — always free
✓ Check your email for the access link!
Want to see an example first? Preview Navy Federal's scorecard →
| ROA |
0.7%
+13.9% YoY-31.1% QoQ
|
-0.2% |
0.9%
+12.5% YoY
|
1.0%
+47.3% YoY
|
1.2%
+121.4% YoY
|
47% |
| NIM |
3.4%
-4.2% YoY-0.6% QoQ
|
-0.3% |
3.7%
+4.5% YoY
|
3.8%
+4.4% YoY
|
3.8%
+2.3% YoY
|
33% |
| Efficiency Ratio |
83.1%
-4.0% YoY+7.0% QoQ
|
+6.4% |
76.7%
-0.8% YoY
|
74.6%
-8.6% YoY
|
83.0%
-5.3% YoY
|
70% |
| Delinquency Rate |
0.4%
-20.3% YoY+8.0% QoQ
|
-0.5 |
0.9%
+6.6% YoY
|
0.9%
+9.0% YoY
|
1.3%
+2.6% YoY
|
28% |
| Loan To Share |
68.8%
-11.3% YoY-2.9% QoQ
|
-2.8% |
71.5%
-0.3% YoY
|
66.6%
+0.6% YoY
|
66.4%
-1.4% YoY
|
42% |
| AMR |
$15,975
+5.8% YoY+2.4% QoQ
|
$-9K |
$25,107
+3.2% YoY
|
$23,154
+6.0% YoY
|
$20,028
-0.9% YoY
|
Bottom 12.8% in tier |
| CD Concentration |
29.6%
+4.3% YoY+0.6% QoQ
|
+5.0% | 24.6% | 18.8% | 20.0% | 50% |
| Indirect Auto % |
45.0%
-16.4% YoY-3.8% QoQ
|
+31.4% | 13.6% | 11.7% | 7.7% | 50% |
Signature Analysis
Strengths (1)
Wallet Share Momentum
growthAverage member relationship growing 5%+ year-over-year. Members are significantly deepening their engagement.
Concerns (5)
Indirect Auto Dependency
riskSignificant portion of loan portfolio in indirect auto (>15%). This concentration creates dependency on dealer relationships.
Stagnation Risk
riskMembership shrinking at least 0.5% year-over-year. Declining member base creates long-term risk even if current operations appear healthy.
Membership Headwinds
declineMembership declining year-over-year. They need solutions to stop the bleeding before it impacts revenue.
Efficiency Drag
riskHigh efficiency ratio (>80%) indicates elevated operating costs relative to revenue. Margin improvement opportunities may exist.
Institutional Decline
declineBoth members and loans declining - the institution is contracting. Leadership is likely under pressure to reverse course.
Metric Rankings
See how this credit union ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.
Strengths: Metrics in the top 25% (75th percentile or higher) Concerns: Metrics in the bottom 25% (25th percentile or lower)