BlastPoint's Credit Union Scorecard
TIDEMARK
Charter #13121 ยท DE
TIDEMARK has 4 strengths but faces 12 concerns
Key Strengths
Areas where this CU excels compared to peers
- + Organic Growth Leader: Top 29.3% in tier
- + Organic Growth Engine: Top 32.1% in tier
- + Total Deposits: Top 3.7% in tier
- + Total Assets: Top 4.1% in tier
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - Efficiency Drag: Bottom 14.2% in tier
- - Deposit Outflow: Bottom 18.8% in tier
- - Credit Quality Pressure: Bottom 19.2% in tier
- - Shrinking Wallet Share: Bottom 20.1% in tier
- - Credit Risk Growth: Bottom 21.1% in tier
- - Indirect Auto Dependency: Bottom 32.1% in tier
- - Flatlined Growth: Bottom 43.7% in tier
- - ROA 0.40% below tier average
- - Efficiency ratio 6.28% above tier (higher cost structure)
- - Net Interest Margin (NIM): Bottom 4.5% in tier
- - Deposit Growth Rate: Bottom 5.7% in tier
- - First Mortgage Concentration (%): Bottom 8.8% in tier
Core Metrics
As of 2025-Q3
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (DE) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Members |
21,969
+0.8% YoY+0.1% QoQ
|
+6.3K |
15,628
-3.4% YoY
|
17,253
+10.0% YoY
|
33,089
+6.1% YoY
|
80% |
| Assets |
$458.1M
-1.7% YoY-0.7% QoQ
|
+$226.8M |
$231.3M
-0.0% YoY
|
$195.2M
+8.0% YoY
|
$547.7M
+7.8% YoY
|
Top 4.2% in tier |
| Loans |
$231.7M
+5.0% YoY+1.7% QoQ
|
+$83.9M |
$147.8M
-1.4% YoY
|
$121.5M
+9.1% YoY
|
$388.7M
+8.6% YoY
|
82% |
| Deposits |
$397.0M
-3.3% YoY-1.6% QoQ
|
+$196.7M |
$200.3M
-0.0% YoY
|
$172.1M
+8.7% YoY
|
$464.6M
+9.3% YoY
|
Top 3.8% in tier |
See Your Full Scorecard
Unlock complete metrics, rankings, and AI-powered insights โ always free
โ Check your email for the access link!
Want to see an example first? Preview Navy Federal's scorecard โ
| ROA |
0.4%
+114.6% YoY+23.5% QoQ
|
-0.4% |
0.8%
+15.5% YoY
|
2.8%
+77.8% YoY
|
0.7%
+273.4% YoY
|
24% |
| NIM |
2.3%
+29.8% YoY+2.7% QoQ
|
-1.2% |
3.6%
+6.9% YoY
|
3.3%
+6.1% YoY
|
3.7%
+5.0% YoY
|
Bottom 4.5% in tier |
| Efficiency Ratio |
83.6%
-9.5% YoY-2.4% QoQ
|
+6.3% |
77.3%
-3.0% YoY
|
77.7%
-4.8% YoY
|
79.1%
-3.3% YoY
|
73% |
| Delinquency Rate |
0.4%
+35.8% YoY+43.8% QoQ
|
-0.5 |
0.9%
+7.6% YoY
|
2.7%
+22.3% YoY
|
1.2%
-0.9% YoY
|
28% |
| Loan To Share |
58.4%
+8.6% YoY+3.3% QoQ
|
-14.3% |
72.7%
-1.5% YoY
|
48.0%
+0.7% YoY
|
68.0%
-1.7% YoY
|
19% |
| AMR |
$28,615
-1.2% YoY-0.6% QoQ
|
+$4K |
$24,363
+2.9% YoY
|
$13,877
+1.3% YoY
|
$19,418
+1.3% YoY
|
79% |
| CD Concentration |
30.5%
-0.8% YoY+1.9% QoQ
|
+6.1% |
24.4%
+4.2% YoY
|
12.6%
+3.7% YoY
|
19.6%
+6.2% YoY
|
50% |
| Indirect Auto % |
17.4%
-10.0% YoY-2.5% QoQ
|
+3.4% |
14.0%
-5.7% YoY
|
7.8%
-5.9% YoY
|
7.9%
-2.9% YoY
|
50% |
Signature Analysis
Strengths (2)
Organic Growth Leader
growthAttracting members (0.5-50% YoY) without heavy indirect auto dependency (<20%). Healthy, sustainable growth model.
Organic Growth Engine
growthGrowing membership while maintaining profitability. Healthy fundamentals in place.
Concerns (7)
Efficiency Drag
riskHigh efficiency ratio (>80%) indicates elevated operating costs relative to revenue. Margin improvement opportunities may exist.
Deposit Outflow
declineMembers staying (>= -1% YoY) but deposits leaving. They're moving money to higher-yield competitors - rate pressure is real.
Credit Quality Pressure
riskDelinquencies are rising year-over-year. Credit risk is building - they may need better underwriting tools.
Shrinking Wallet Share
declineAverage member relationship declining year-over-year. Members may be moving money elsewhere or reducing engagement.
Credit Risk Growth
riskLoan portfolio growing while delinquencies are rising. Expansion with deteriorating credit quality needs attention.
Indirect Auto Dependency
riskSignificant portion of loan portfolio in indirect auto (>15%). This concentration creates dependency on dealer relationships.
Flatlined Growth
riskAsset growth stalled (-2% to +2%) despite healthy profitability (>0.25% ROA). Suggests untapped opportunity or strategic drift worth investigating.
Metric Rankings
See how this credit union ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.
Strengths: Metrics in the top 25% (75th percentile or higher) Concerns: Metrics in the bottom 25% (25th percentile or lower)