BlastPoint's Credit Union Scorecard
LONG BEACH CITY EMPLOYEES
Charter #1438 · CA
LONG BEACH CITY EMPLOYEES has 4 strengths but faces 8 concerns
Key Strengths
Areas where this CU excels compared to peers
- + Organic Growth Leader: Top 50.0% in tier
- + Organic Growth Engine: Top 50.0% in tier
- + Total Delinquency Rate (60+ days): Top 0.8% in tier
- + Average Member Relationship (AMR): Top 8.6% in tier
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - Efficiency Drag: Bottom 50.0% in tier
- - Deposit Outflow: Bottom 50.0% in tier
- - Shrinking Wallet Share: Bottom 50.0% in tier
- - ROA 0.55% below tier average
- - Efficiency ratio 7.43% above tier (higher cost structure)
- - Net Interest Margin (NIM): Bottom 1.5% in tier
- - First Mortgage Concentration (%): Bottom 3.1% in tier
- - Fee Income Per Member: Bottom 8.3% in tier
NEW · Q2 2026 RECAP
Your Quarter, Wrapped
A 35-second highlight reel of your Q2 2026 — the wins worth celebrating and the one signal worth watching, pulled straight from your scorecard data.
Q2 2026 at a glance
- One of 1,024 credit unions with $100M-$500M in assets nationally, and 1 of 57 that size in California.
- Shares and deposits -1.4% year over year ($234M in shares and deposits).
- Membership: 9,785 members, +0.9% vs a year ago.
- Delinquency rate 0.01%.
- Return on assets 0.31%.
- Efficiency ratio 84.17% vs a 76.73% peer average.
- Loan-to-share ratio 52.07% vs a 71.54% peer average.
Data period: Q2 2026 NCUA call report. Animation disabled (reduced-motion preference). Full details in the metrics table below.
Core Metrics
As of 2026-Q2
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (CA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Members |
9,785
+0.9% YoY-0.5% QoQ
|
-5.4K |
15,168
-2.6% YoY
|
67,400
+7.3% YoY
|
34,678
+6.6% YoY
|
31% |
| Assets |
$270.6M
+0.2% YoY-3.1% QoQ
|
+$38.6M |
$232.0M
+0.7% YoY
|
$1.4B
+10.3% YoY
|
$593.1M
+10.2% YoY
|
68% |
| Loans |
$121.8M
+2.7% YoY+3.7% QoQ
|
$-24.4M |
$146.3M
+0.2% YoY
|
$958.9M
+10.2% YoY
|
$418.6M
+10.1% YoY
|
49% |
| Deposits |
$234.0M
-1.4% YoY-0.6% QoQ
|
+$33.3M |
$200.7M
+0.2% YoY
|
$1.2B
+11.1% YoY
|
$504.8M
+10.3% YoY
|
67% |
See Your Full Scorecard
Unlock complete metrics, rankings, and AI-powered insights — always free
✓ Check your email for the access link!
Want to see an example first? Preview Navy Federal's scorecard →
| ROA |
0.3%
+400.5% YoY+37.3% QoQ
|
-0.6% |
0.9%
+12.5% YoY
|
2.5%
+328.4% YoY
|
1.2%
+121.4% YoY
|
16% |
| NIM |
2.1%
+24.9% YoY+6.5% QoQ
|
-1.6% |
3.7%
+4.5% YoY
|
3.4%
+4.4% YoY
|
3.8%
+2.3% YoY
|
Bottom 1.4% in tier |
| Efficiency Ratio |
84.2%
-12.1% YoY-2.1% QoQ
|
+7.4% |
76.7%
-0.8% YoY
|
79.7%
-4.5% YoY
|
83.0%
-5.3% YoY
|
73% |
| Delinquency Rate | 0.0% | -0.9 |
0.9%
+6.6% YoY
|
0.7%
-14.3% YoY
|
1.3%
+2.6% YoY
|
Top 0.8% in tier |
| Loan To Share |
52.1%
+4.2% YoY+4.3% QoQ
|
-19.5% |
71.5%
-0.3% YoY
|
69.0%
+0.5% YoY
|
66.4%
-1.4% YoY
|
Bottom 14.0% in tier |
| AMR |
$36,363
-1.0% YoY+1.4% QoQ
|
+$11K |
$25,107
+3.2% YoY
|
$29,171
+2.5% YoY
|
$20,028
-0.9% YoY
|
Top 8.7% in tier |
| CD Concentration | 0.0% | -24.6% | 24.6% | 22.2% | 20.0% | 50% |
| Indirect Auto % | 0.0% | -13.6% | 13.6% | 9.2% | 7.7% | 50% |
Signature Analysis
Strengths (2)
Organic Growth Leader
growthAttracting members (0.5-50% YoY) without heavy indirect auto dependency (<15%). Healthy, sustainable growth model.
Organic Growth Engine
growthGrowing membership while maintaining profitability. Healthy fundamentals in place.
Concerns (3)
Efficiency Drag
riskHigh efficiency ratio (>80%) indicates elevated operating costs relative to revenue. Margin improvement opportunities may exist.
Deposit Outflow
declineMembers staying (>= -1% YoY) but deposits leaving. They're moving money to higher-yield competitors - rate pressure is real.
Shrinking Wallet Share
declineAverage member relationship declining year-over-year. Members may be moving money elsewhere or reducing engagement.
Metric Rankings
See how this credit union ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.
Strengths: Metrics in the top 25% (75th percentile or higher) Concerns: Metrics in the bottom 25% (25th percentile or lower)