BlastPoint's Credit Union Scorecard
EDWARDS
Charter #14830 · CA
EDWARDS has 4 strengths but faces 8 concerns
Key Strengths
Areas where this CU excels compared to peers
- + Organic Growth Leader: Top 50.0% in tier
- + Organic Growth Engine: Top 50.0% in tier
- + Strong member growth: 30.3% YoY
- + Member Growth Rate: Top 0.9% in tier
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - Shrinking Wallet Share: Bottom 50.0% in tier
- - Credit Risk Growth: Bottom 50.0% in tier
- - Credit Quality Pressure: Bottom 50.0% in tier
- - Efficiency Drag: Bottom 50.0% in tier
- - ROA 0.69% below tier average
- - Efficiency ratio 16.98% above tier (higher cost structure)
- - AMR Growth Rate: Bottom 0.7% in tier
- - Net Worth Ratio: Bottom 9.0% in tier
NEW · Q2 2026 RECAP
Your Quarter, Wrapped
A 35-second highlight reel of your Q2 2026 — the wins worth celebrating and the one signal worth watching, pulled straight from your scorecard data.
Q2 2026 at a glance
- One of 1,024 credit unions with $100M-$500M in assets nationally, and 1 of 57 that size in California.
- Shares and deposits +3.2% year over year ($254M in shares and deposits).
- Membership: 16,557 members, +30.3% vs a year ago.
- Delinquency rate 0.81%.
- Return on assets 0.17%.
- Efficiency ratio 93.71% vs a 76.73% peer average.
- Loan-to-share ratio 60.50% vs a 71.54% peer average.
Data period: Q2 2026 NCUA call report. Animation disabled (reduced-motion preference). Full details in the metrics table below.
Core Metrics
As of 2026-Q2
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (CA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Members |
16,557
+30.3% YoY-0.6% QoQ
|
+1.4K |
15,168
-2.6% YoY
|
67,400
+7.3% YoY
|
34,678
+6.6% YoY
|
65% |
| Assets |
$276.6M
+3.4% YoY-0.8% QoQ
|
+$44.6M |
$232.0M
+0.7% YoY
|
$1.4B
+10.3% YoY
|
$593.1M
+10.2% YoY
|
70% |
| Loans |
$153.6M
+7.5% YoY-0.9% QoQ
|
+$7.3M |
$146.3M
+0.2% YoY
|
$958.9M
+10.2% YoY
|
$418.6M
+10.1% YoY
|
62% |
| Deposits |
$253.9M
+3.2% YoY-0.8% QoQ
|
+$53.2M |
$200.7M
+0.2% YoY
|
$1.2B
+11.1% YoY
|
$504.8M
+10.3% YoY
|
72% |
See Your Full Scorecard
Unlock complete metrics, rankings, and AI-powered insights — always free
✓ Check your email for the access link!
Want to see an example first? Preview Navy Federal's scorecard →
| ROA |
0.2%
-194.3% YoY-211.3% QoQ
|
-0.7% |
0.9%
+12.5% YoY
|
2.5%
+328.4% YoY
|
1.2%
+121.4% YoY
|
Bottom 7.1% in tier |
| NIM |
3.7%
+11.7% YoY+1.7% QoQ
|
+0.0% |
3.7%
+4.5% YoY
|
3.4%
+4.4% YoY
|
3.8%
+2.3% YoY
|
49% |
| Efficiency Ratio |
93.7%
-3.5% YoY-5.3% QoQ
|
+17.0% |
76.7%
-0.8% YoY
|
79.7%
-4.5% YoY
|
83.0%
-5.3% YoY
|
Bottom 5.4% in tier |
| Delinquency Rate |
0.8%
+27.7% YoY-6.8% QoQ
|
-0.1 |
0.9%
+6.6% YoY
|
0.7%
-14.3% YoY
|
1.3%
+2.6% YoY
|
58% |
| Loan To Share |
60.5%
+4.2% YoY-0.1% QoQ
|
-11.0% |
71.5%
-0.3% YoY
|
69.0%
+0.5% YoY
|
66.4%
-1.4% YoY
|
26% |
| AMR |
$24,610
-19.6% YoY-0.2% QoQ
|
$-496 |
$25,107
+3.2% YoY
|
$29,171
+2.5% YoY
|
$20,028
-0.9% YoY
|
59% |
| CD Concentration |
14.7%
-8.8% YoY-0.5% QoQ
|
-9.9% | 24.6% | 22.2% | 20.0% | 50% |
| Indirect Auto % |
8.0%
+3.7% YoY-3.4% QoQ
|
-5.6% | 13.6% | 9.2% | 7.7% | 50% |
Signature Analysis
Strengths (2)
Organic Growth Leader
growthAttracting members (0.5-50% YoY) without heavy indirect auto dependency (<15%). Healthy, sustainable growth model.
Organic Growth Engine
growthGrowing membership while maintaining profitability. Healthy fundamentals in place.
Concerns (4)
Shrinking Wallet Share
declineAverage member relationship declining year-over-year. Members may be moving money elsewhere or reducing engagement.
Credit Risk Growth
riskLoan portfolio growing while delinquencies are rising. Expansion with deteriorating credit quality needs attention.
Credit Quality Pressure
riskDelinquencies are rising year-over-year. Credit risk is building - they may need better underwriting tools.
Efficiency Drag
riskHigh efficiency ratio (>80%) indicates elevated operating costs relative to revenue. Margin improvement opportunities may exist.
Metric Rankings
See how this credit union ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.
Strengths: Metrics in the top 25% (75th percentile or higher) Concerns: Metrics in the bottom 25% (25th percentile or lower)