BlastPoint's Credit Union Scorecard

KEESLER

Charter #5561 · MS

Large 5B-7B
35 CUs in 5B-7B nationally 1 in MS
View Large leaderboard →

KEESLER has 9 strengths but faces 9 concerns

Key Strengths

Areas where this CU excels compared to peers

  • + Emerging Performer: Top 5.3% in tier
  • + Organic Growth Engine: Top 11.3% in tier
  • + ROA 0.13% above tier average
  • + Net Interest Margin 0.49% above tier average
  • + Strong member growth: 16.6% YoY
  • + Member Growth Rate: Top 0.0% in tier
  • + Asset Growth Rate: Top 0.0% in tier
  • + Deposit Growth Rate: Top 0.0% in tier
  • + Loan Growth Rate: Top 2.9% in tier

Key Concerns

Areas that may need attention

  • - Indirect Auto Dependency: Bottom 29.4% in tier
  • - Credit Risk Growth: Bottom 33.3% in tier
  • - Credit Quality Pressure: Bottom 63.9% in tier
  • - Liquidity Strain: Bottom 71.9% in tier
  • - Cost Spiral: Bottom 100.0% in tier
  • - Efficiency ratio 4.00% above tier (higher cost structure)
  • - Delinquency rate 0.14% above tier average
  • - Total Deposits: Bottom 2.9% in tier
  • - Average Member Relationship (AMR): Bottom 8.6% in tier

Core Metrics

As of 2025-Q4

Metric Current vs Tier Tier Avg State Avg (MS) National Avg Tier Percentile
Members 385,256
+16.6% YoY+0.7% QoQ
+92.9K 292,342
-2.4% YoY
14,672
+15.4% YoY
33,374
+5.7% YoY
83%
Assets $5.2B
+22.8% YoY+1.8% QoQ
$-582.1M $5.7B
-0.2% YoY
$175.8M
+23.7% YoY
$561.6M
+9.7% YoY
20%
Loans $3.6B
+14.4% YoY+0.1% QoQ
$-544.5M $4.2B
-1.6% YoY
$116.9M
+20.6% YoY
$397.0M
+8.8% YoY
23%
Deposits $4.0B
+22.3% YoY+2.5% QoQ
$-882.6M $4.8B
+0.4% YoY
$139.2M
+23.5% YoY
$477.3M
+9.7% YoY
Bottom 0.0% in tier

See Your Full Scorecard

Unlock complete metrics, rankings, and AI-powered insights — always free

Tier 1
50+ financial metrics with peer benchmarks
Performance signatures (strengths & concerns)
AI-generated insights and rankings

Want to see an example first? Preview Navy Federal's scorecard →

ROA 0.9%
-4.3% YoY-4.5% QoQ
+0.1% 0.8%
+27.9% YoY
0.8%
+172.9% YoY
0.7%
+15.9% YoY
69%
NIM 3.5%
-2.9% YoY-5.1% QoQ
+0.5% 3.0%
+8.0% YoY
4.4%
+3.3% YoY
3.8%
+5.1% YoY
77%
Efficiency Ratio 71.3%
+8.5% YoY+2.2% QoQ
+4.0% 67.3%
-3.7% YoY
79.5%
-8.9% YoY
79.7%
-3.3% YoY
63%
Delinquency Rate 0.9%
+7.7% YoY+18.5% QoQ
+0.1 0.8%
+17.5% YoY
2.7%
-0.7% YoY
1.3%
-2.1% YoY
69%
Loan To Share 91.3%
-6.5% YoY-2.3% QoQ
+5.4% 85.9%
-2.6% YoY
68.0%
-1.8% YoY
67.4%
-1.7% YoY
46%
AMR $19,689
+1.6% YoY+0.6% QoQ
$-15K $34,289
+3.5% YoY
$12,283
+3.8% YoY
$19,687
+2.0% YoY
Bottom 5.7% in tier
CD Concentration 25.5%
+1.7% YoY+1.2% QoQ
-3.7% 29.1% 19.4% 19.8% 31%
Indirect Auto % 25.6%
+3.5% YoY-0.6% QoQ
+8.5% 17.1% 2.5% 7.8% 75%

Signature Analysis

Strengths (2)

Emerging Performer

growth
#2 of 20 • Top 5.3% in tier

Smaller CU (bottom 50% by assets in tier) with strong profitability (ROA > 0.5%) AND growth (members >= 1%). Emerging leaders worth watching.

Why This Signature
Return on Assets: 0.95%
(Tier: 0.90%, National: 0.67%)
better than tier avg
Member Growth (YoY): 16.55%
(Tier: 4.35%, National: 4.32%)
better than tier avg
20 of 68 Large CUs have this signature | 282 nationally
→ No prior data (20 CUs now) | New qualifier

Organic Growth Engine

growth
#7 of 54 • Top 11.3% in tier

Growing membership while maintaining profitability. Healthy fundamentals in place.

Why This Signature
Member Growth (YoY): 16.55%
(Tier: 4.35%, National: 4.32%)
better than tier avg
Return on Assets: 0.95%
(Tier: 0.90%, National: 0.67%)
better than tier avg
Indirect Auto %: 25.59%
(Tier: 17.09%, National: 7.78%)
but worse than tier avg
54 of 68 Large CUs have this signature | 913 nationally
→ No prior data (54 CUs now) | New qualifier

Concerns (5)

Indirect Auto Dependency

risk
#11 of 35 • Bottom 29.4% in tier

Significant portion of loan portfolio in indirect auto (>15%). This concentration creates dependency on dealer relationships.

Why This Signature
Asset Growth (YoY): 22.79%
(Tier: 8.38%, National: 3.54%)
but better than tier avg
Indirect Auto %: 25.59%
(Tier: 17.09%, National: 7.78%)
worse than tier avg
Member Growth (YoY): 16.55%
(Tier: 4.35%, National: 4.32%)
but better than tier avg
35 of 68 Large CUs have this signature | 745 nationally
→ Stable (35→35 CUs) | Rank improving

Credit Risk Growth

risk
#11 of 31 • Bottom 33.3% in tier

Loan portfolio growing while delinquencies are rising. Expansion with deteriorating credit quality needs attention.

Why This Signature
Loan Growth (YoY): 14.37%
(Tier: 6.96%, National: 111.96%)
but better than tier avg
Delinquency Change (YoY): 0.07% points
(Tier: 0.04% points, National: 0.06% points)
worse than tier avg
31 of 68 Large CUs have this signature | 665 nationally
→ No prior data (31 CUs now) | New qualifier

Credit Quality Pressure

risk
#24 of 37 • Bottom 63.9% in tier

Delinquencies are rising year-over-year. Credit risk is building - they may need better underwriting tools.

Why This Signature
Delinquency Change (YoY): 0.07% points
(Tier: 0.04% points, National: 0.06% points)
worse than tier avg
37 of 68 Large CUs have this signature | 969 nationally
→ Stable (41→37 CUs) -4 CUs YoY | New qualifier

Liquidity Strain

risk
#24 of 33 • Bottom 71.9% in tier

Loan demand outpacing deposits. They're bumping against liquidity limits - need funding solutions.

Why This Signature
Loan-to-Share Ratio: 91.32%
(Tier: 84.88%, National: 67.44%)
but better than tier avg
Loan Growth (YoY): 14.37%
(Tier: 6.96%, National: 111.96%)
but better than tier avg
33 of 68 Large CUs have this signature | 439 nationally
↑ Growing +6 CUs YoY | Rank improving

Cost Spiral

risk
#3 of 3 • Bottom 100.0% in tier

Historically lean operator (<75% efficiency) now seeing 5+ point efficiency ratio increase despite strong profitability (>0.50% ROA). Efficiency advantage eroding.

Why This Signature
Efficiency Ratio Change: 5.57% points
(Tier: -1.23% points, National: -1.81% points)
worse than tier avg
Efficiency Ratio (Prior Year): 51.76%
(Tier: 43.32%, National: 63.66%)
worse than tier avg
3 of 68 Large CUs have this signature | 58 nationally
→ Stable (1→3 CUs) +2 CUs YoY | New qualifier

Metric Rankings

See how this credit union ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.

Strengths: Metrics in the top 25% (75th percentile or higher) Concerns: Metrics in the bottom 25% (25th percentile or lower)

Comparing against 35 peers in tier

Top Strengths (8 metrics)

1
Member Growth Rate
growth
Value: 16.55%
Peer Median: -
#1 of 35 Top 0.0% in 5B-7B tier
1
Asset Growth Rate
growth
Value: 22.79%
Peer Median: -
#1 of 35 Top 0.0% in 5B-7B tier
1
Deposit Growth Rate
growth
Value: 22.28%
Peer Median: -
#1 of 35 Top 0.0% in 5B-7B tier
2
Loan Growth Rate
growth
Value: 14.37%
Peer Median: -
#2 of 35 Top 2.9% in 5B-7B tier
6
Total Members
engagement
Value: 385,256
Peer Median: -
#6 of 35 Top 14.3% in 5B-7B tier
7
Share Certificate Concentration (%)
balance_sheet
Value: 25.49%
Peer Median: -
#7 of 35 Top 17.1% in 5B-7B tier
8
Net Interest Margin (NIM)
profitability
Value: 3.53%
Peer Median: -
#8 of 35 Top 20.0% in 5B-7B tier
8
Net Worth Ratio
risk
Value: 12.37%
Peer Median: -
#8 of 35 Top 20.0% in 5B-7B tier

Top Weaknesses (4 metrics)

35
Total Deposits
balance_sheet
Value: $3.96B
Peer Median: -
#35 of 35 Bottom 2.9% in 5B-7B tier
33
Average Member Relationship (AMR)
engagement
Value: $19,689
Peer Median: -
#33 of 35 Bottom 8.6% in 5B-7B tier
32
Loan-to-Member Ratio (LMR)
engagement
Value: $9,398
Peer Median: -
#32 of 35 Bottom 11.4% in 5B-7B tier
28
Total Assets
balance_sheet
Value: $5.16B
Peer Median: -
#28 of 35 Bottom 22.9% in 5B-7B tier
Link copied to clipboard!