BlastPoint's Credit Union Scorecard
POWER FINANCIAL
Charter #68445 · FL
POWER FINANCIAL has 8 strengths but faces 8 concerns
How does the industry compare?
What's your peer group doing?
How does FL stack up?
Key Strengths
Areas where this CU excels compared to peers
- + Relationship Depth Leader: Top 10.5% in tier
- + Wallet Share Momentum: Top 10.5% in tier
- + Organic Growth Engine: Top 37.9% in tier
- + Organic Growth Leader: Top 37.9% in tier
- + Emerging Performer: Top 47.5% in tier
- + Loan-to-Member Ratio (LMR): Top 4.9% in tier
- + Average Member Relationship (AMR): Top 5.2% in tier
- + Deposit Growth Rate: Top 5.9% in tier
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - Credit Quality Pressure: Bottom 0.8% in tier
- - Cost Spiral: Bottom 2.9% in tier
- - Credit Risk Growth: Bottom 41.6% in tier
- - Efficiency ratio 3.19% above tier (higher cost structure)
- - Delinquency rate 2.30% above tier average
- - Total Delinquency Rate (60+ days): Bottom 2.0% in tier
- - Total Members: Bottom 2.3% in tier
- - Members Per Employee (MPE): Bottom 2.3% in tier
Core Metrics
As of 2026-Q1
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (FL) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Members |
34,736
+3.1% YoY+1.3% QoQ
|
-61.3K |
96,048
-2.7% YoY
|
74,034
+8.9% YoY
|
33,913
+5.7% YoY
|
Bottom 2.0% in tier |
| Assets |
$1.0B
+15.8% YoY+6.7% QoQ
|
$-677.8M |
$1.7B
+0.4% YoY
|
$1.2B
+11.7% YoY
|
$578.3M
+9.0% YoY
|
Bottom 3.9% in tier |
| Loans |
$708.7M
+7.0% YoY-0.1% QoQ
|
$-505.0M |
$1.2B
+0.2% YoY
|
$841.5M
+13.6% YoY
|
$402.4M
+8.7% YoY
|
Bottom 8.5% in tier |
| Deposits |
$859.2M
+17.8% YoY+7.7% QoQ
|
$-606.3M |
$1.5B
+0.5% YoY
|
$1.0B
+12.4% YoY
|
$494.3M
+9.1% YoY
|
Bottom 2.6% in tier |
See Your Full Scorecard
Unlock complete metrics, rankings, and AI-powered insights — always free
✓ Check your email for the access link!
Want to see an example first? Preview Navy Federal's scorecard →
| ROA |
0.7%
-31.8% YoY-28.9% QoQ
|
+0.0% |
0.7%
+27.6% YoY
|
0.6%
-11.7% YoY
|
0.4%
-39.2% YoY
|
54% |
| NIM |
2.9%
-16.6% YoY-10.1% QoQ
|
-0.4% |
3.4%
+6.2% YoY
|
3.6%
+2.7% YoY
|
3.8%
+4.1% YoY
|
20% |
| Efficiency Ratio |
77.8%
+16.0% YoY+15.0% QoQ
|
+3.2% |
74.6%
-3.0% YoY
|
80.0%
+2.7% YoY
|
84.6%
+2.8% YoY
|
63% |
| Delinquency Rate |
3.1%
+1265.9% YoY-14.4% QoQ
|
+2.3 |
0.8%
+6.9% YoY
|
0.6%
+6.2% YoY
|
1.2%
+3.4% YoY
|
Bottom 2.0% in tier |
| Loan To Share |
82.5%
-9.2% YoY-7.2% QoQ
|
-0.7% |
83.2%
-0.4% YoY
|
70.1%
+1.4% YoY
|
65.6%
-1.4% YoY
|
41% |
| AMR |
$45,138
+9.2% YoY+2.7% QoQ
|
+$15K |
$29,652
+2.3% YoY
|
$23,044
+4.5% YoY
|
$19,920
+1.6% YoY
|
Top 5.6% in tier |
| CD Concentration |
26.1%
+53.8% YoY-0.3% QoQ
|
-2.7% | 28.8% | 24.4% | 19.8% | 40% |
| Indirect Auto % |
0.1%
-49.6% YoY-17.1% QoQ
|
-17.9% | 18.1% | 10.8% | 7.7% | Top 14.1% in tier |
Signature Analysis
Strengths (5)
Relationship Depth Leader
growthTop-tier average member relationship within peer group, with stable or growing engagement. Strong wallet share positioning.
Wallet Share Momentum
growthAverage member relationship growing 5%+ year-over-year. Members are significantly deepening their engagement.
Organic Growth Engine
growthGrowing membership while maintaining profitability. Healthy fundamentals in place.
Organic Growth Leader
growthAttracting members (0.5-50% YoY) without heavy indirect auto dependency (<15%). Healthy, sustainable growth model.
Emerging Performer
growthSmaller CU (bottom 50% by assets in tier) with strong profitability (ROA > 0.5%) AND growth (members >= 1%). Emerging leaders worth watching.
Concerns (3)
Credit Quality Pressure
riskDelinquencies are rising year-over-year. Credit risk is building - they may need better underwriting tools.
Credit Risk Growth
riskLoan portfolio growing while delinquencies are rising. Expansion with deteriorating credit quality needs attention.
Cost Spiral
riskHistorically lean operator (<75% efficiency) now seeing 5+ point efficiency ratio increase despite strong profitability (>0.50% ROA). Efficiency advantage eroding.
Metric Rankings
See how this credit union ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.
Strengths: Metrics in the top 25% (75th percentile or higher) Concerns: Metrics in the bottom 25% (25th percentile or lower)