BlastPoint's Credit Union Scorecard
CONNEX
Charter #68511 · CT
CONNEX faces 8 concerns requiring attention
How does the industry compare?
What's your peer group doing?
How does CT stack up?
Key Strengths
Areas where this CU excels compared to peers
No key strengths identified
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - Efficiency Drag: Bottom 14.9% in tier
- - Liquidity Strain: Bottom 18.9% in tier
- - Stagnation Risk: Bottom 80.6% in tier
- - Membership Headwinds: Bottom 80.6% in tier
- - Indirect Auto Dependency: Bottom 87.9% in tier
- - Institutional Decline: Bottom 94.4% in tier
- - ROA 0.41% below tier average
- - Efficiency ratio 8.70% above tier (higher cost structure)
NEW · Q2 2026 RECAP
Your Quarter, Wrapped
A 35-second highlight reel of your Q2 2026 — the wins worth celebrating and the one signal worth watching, pulled straight from your scorecard data.
Q2 2026 at a glance
- One of 300 credit unions with $1B-$3B in assets nationally, and 1 of 5 that size in Connecticut.
- Shares and deposits +1.5% year over year ($903M in shares and deposits).
- Membership: 69,473 members, -1.2% vs a year ago.
- Delinquency rate 0.56%.
- Return on assets 0.41%.
- Efficiency ratio 81.72% vs a 73.02% peer average.
- Loan-to-share ratio 99.08% vs a 84.71% peer average.
Data period: Q2 2026 NCUA call report. Animation disabled (reduced-motion preference). Full details in the metrics table below.
Core Metrics
As of 2026-Q2
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (CT) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Members |
69,473
-1.2% YoY+1.2% QoQ
|
-27.4K |
96,861
-1.9% YoY
|
14,203
+5.8% YoY
|
34,678
+6.6% YoY
|
26% |
| Assets |
$1.1B
+0.1% YoY+1.3% QoQ
|
$-666.5M |
$1.7B
+0.4% YoY
|
$248.5M
+12.0% YoY
|
$593.1M
+10.2% YoY
|
Bottom 7.0% in tier |
| Loans |
$894.3M
-1.3% YoY+0.9% QoQ
|
$-340.0M |
$1.2B
+0.7% YoY
|
$139.3M
+11.4% YoY
|
$418.6M
+10.1% YoY
|
26% |
| Deposits |
$902.6M
+1.5% YoY+0.9% QoQ
|
$-560.8M |
$1.5B
+0.5% YoY
|
$217.7M
+11.5% YoY
|
$504.8M
+10.3% YoY
|
Bottom 8.0% in tier |
See Your Full Scorecard
Unlock complete metrics, rankings, and AI-powered insights — always free
✓ Check your email for the access link!
Want to see an example first? Preview Navy Federal's scorecard →
| ROA |
0.4%
+83.3% YoY+120.2% QoQ
|
-0.4% |
0.8%
+27.6% YoY
|
1.1%
+193.3% YoY
|
1.2%
+121.4% YoY
|
18% |
| NIM |
2.6%
+15.6% YoY+2.6% QoQ
|
-0.8% |
3.4%
+6.6% YoY
|
3.6%
-1.0% YoY
|
3.8%
+2.3% YoY
|
Bottom 6.7% in tier |
| Efficiency Ratio |
81.7%
-1.4% YoY-6.8% QoQ
|
+8.7% |
73.0%
-2.7% YoY
|
90.9%
-27.8% YoY
|
83.0%
-5.3% YoY
|
84% |
| Delinquency Rate |
0.6%
-22.7% YoY+0.6% QoQ
|
-0.3 |
0.9%
+7.3% YoY
|
1.4%
+21.8% YoY
|
1.3%
+2.6% YoY
|
34% |
| Loan To Share |
99.1%
-2.7% YoY+0.0% QoQ
|
+14.4% |
84.7%
+0.1% YoY
|
53.6%
-1.6% YoY
|
66.4%
-1.4% YoY
|
84% |
| AMR |
$25,864
+1.3% YoY-0.3% QoQ
|
$-4K |
$29,575
+1.5% YoY
|
$17,514
+4.9% YoY
|
$20,028
-0.9% YoY
|
35% |
| CD Concentration |
36.1%
+1.9% YoY+2.2% QoQ
|
+7.1% | 29.1% | 14.9% | 20.0% | 80% |
| Indirect Auto % |
39.6%
-7.5% YoY-1.3% QoQ
|
+21.5% | 18.1% | 4.3% | 7.7% | Bottom 10.4% in tier |
Signature Analysis
Strengths (0)
Concerns (6)
Indirect Auto Dependency
riskSignificant portion of loan portfolio in indirect auto (>15%). This concentration creates dependency on dealer relationships.
Stagnation Risk
riskMembership shrinking at least 0.5% year-over-year. Declining member base creates long-term risk even if current operations appear healthy.
Efficiency Drag
riskHigh efficiency ratio (>80%) indicates elevated operating costs relative to revenue. Margin improvement opportunities may exist.
Liquidity Strain
riskLoan demand outpacing deposits. They're bumping against liquidity limits - need funding solutions.
Membership Headwinds
declineMembership declining year-over-year. They need solutions to stop the bleeding before it impacts revenue.
Institutional Decline
declineBoth members and loans declining - the institution is contracting. Leadership is likely under pressure to reverse course.
Metric Rankings
See how this credit union ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.
Strengths: Metrics in the top 25% (75th percentile or higher) Concerns: Metrics in the bottom 25% (25th percentile or lower)