NUTMEG STATE FINANCIAL
Charter #68657 | CT
NUTMEG STATE FINANCIAL has 10 strengths but faces 10 concerns
Key Strengths
Areas where this CU excels compared to peers
- + Organic Growth Engine: Top 15.8% in tier
- + Wallet Share Momentum: Top 33.5% in tier
- + Relationship Depth Leader: Top 35.3% in tier
- + Net Interest Margin 0.44% above tier average
- + Strong member growth: 5.4% YoY
- + Total Loans: Top 3.6% in tier
- + Members Per Employee (MPE): Top 5.3% in tier
- + Loan-to-Share Ratio: Top 6.5% in tier
- + Total Members: Top 8.3% in tier
- + Member Growth Rate: Top 9.5% in tier
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - Liquidity Strain: Bottom 2.1% in tier
- - Growth-at-Risk: Bottom 3.9% in tier
- - Credit Quality Pressure: Bottom 9.3% in tier
- - Indirect Auto Dependency: Bottom 28.1% in tier
- - Efficiency Drag: Bottom 28.6% in tier
- - Liquidity Overhang: Bottom 35.1% in tier
- - ROA 0.03% below tier average
- - Efficiency ratio 3.53% above tier (higher cost structure)
- - Delinquency rate 0.03% above tier average
- - Fee Income Per Member: Bottom 9.5% in tier
Core Metrics
As of 2025-Q3
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (CT) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Members |
55,418
+5.4% YoY+1.0% QoQ
|
+15.7K |
39,752
-2.7% YoY
|
13,754
+3.9% YoY
|
33,089
+6.1% YoY
|
Top 8.9% in tier |
| Assets |
$716.8M
+3.9% YoY+2.6% QoQ
|
+$94.4M |
$622.4M
+0.3% YoY
|
$223.0M
+8.2% YoY
|
$547.7M
+7.8% YoY
|
Top 14.2% in tier |
| Loans |
$599.0M
+10.8% YoY+3.2% QoQ
|
+$163.1M |
$435.9M
-0.4% YoY
|
$129.0M
+9.8% YoY
|
$388.7M
+8.6% YoY
|
Top 4.1% in tier |
| Deposits |
$596.9M
+3.2% YoY+0.0% QoQ
|
+$58.8M |
$538.0M
+1.3% YoY
|
$195.5M
+7.9% YoY
|
$464.6M
+9.3% YoY
|
Top 23.7% in tier |
| ROA |
0.6%
+152.1% YoY+5.0% QoQ
|
-0.0% |
0.7%
+33.9% YoY
|
0.4%
-140.5% YoY
|
0.7%
+273.4% YoY
|
51st in tier |
| NIM |
3.9%
+19.6% YoY+0.1% QoQ
|
+0.4% |
3.4%
+8.6% YoY
|
3.6%
+5.0% YoY
|
3.7%
+5.0% YoY
|
Top 18.9% in tier |
| Efficiency Ratio |
81.6%
-6.1% YoY+0.7% QoQ
|
+3.5% |
78.1%
-3.4% YoY
|
85.8%
+0.7% YoY
|
79.1%
-3.3% YoY
|
68th in tier |
| Delinquency Rate |
0.8%
+69.2% YoY+15.0% QoQ
|
+0.0 |
0.8%
-4.9% YoY
|
1.2%
+0.2% YoY
|
1.2%
-0.9% YoY
|
64th in tier |
| Loan To Share |
100.4%
+7.4% YoY+3.1% QoQ
|
+19.3% |
81.0%
-1.8% YoY
|
56.5%
+1.7% YoY
|
68.0%
-1.7% YoY
|
Top 7.1% in tier |
| AMR |
$21,579
+1.4% YoY+0.6% QoQ
|
$-5K |
$26,482
+2.6% YoY
|
$16,763
+4.9% YoY
|
$19,418
+1.3% YoY
|
Bottom 23.7% in tier |
| CD Concentration |
36.5%
+11.6% YoY+7.4% QoQ
|
+12.1% |
24.4%
+4.2% YoY
|
14.4%
+16.9% YoY
|
19.6%
+6.2% YoY
|
Top 12.4% in tier |
| Indirect Auto % |
21.9%
+655.7% YoY+1.5% QoQ
|
+7.9% |
14.0%
-5.8% YoY
|
5.3%
-6.5% YoY
|
7.9%
-2.9% YoY
|
74th in tier |
Signature Analysis
Strengths (3)
Organic Growth Engine
growthGrowing membership while maintaining profitability. Healthy fundamentals in place.
Wallet Share Momentum
growthAverage member relationship growing year-over-year. Members are deepening their engagement.
Relationship Depth Leader
growthAverage member relationship growing year-over-year. Increasing engagement suggests members are consolidating more business here.
Concerns (6)
Liquidity Strain
riskLoan demand outpacing deposits. They're bumping against liquidity limits - need funding solutions.
Growth-at-Risk
riskLoan portfolio growing while delinquencies are rising. Expansion with deteriorating credit quality needs attention.
Credit Quality Pressure
riskDelinquencies are rising year-over-year. Credit risk is building - they may need better underwriting tools.
Indirect Auto Dependency
riskSignificant portion of loan portfolio in indirect auto (>15%). This concentration creates dependency on dealer relationships.
Efficiency Drag
riskHigh efficiency ratio (>80%) indicates elevated operating costs relative to revenue. Margin improvement opportunities may exist.
Liquidity Overhang
riskVery high net worth ratio (>12%). Strong capital position may indicate opportunity to deploy capital more productively.
Metric Rankings
See how this credit union ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.
Strengths: Metrics in the top 25% (75th percentile or higher) | Concerns: Metrics in the bottom 25% (25th percentile or lower)