BlastPoint's Credit Union Scorecard

VISIONS

Charter #17429 · NY

Large 5B-7B
35 CUs in 5B-7B nationally 1 in NY
View Large leaderboard →

VISIONS has 2 strengths but faces 5 concerns

Key Strengths

Areas where this CU excels compared to peers

  • + Organic Growth Leader: Top 96.4% in tier
  • + Organic Growth Engine: Top 100.0% in tier

Key Concerns

Areas that may need attention

  • - Credit Quality Pressure: Bottom 16.7% in tier
  • - Efficiency Drag: Bottom 66.7% in tier
  • - ROA 0.44% below tier average
  • - Efficiency ratio 13.27% above tier (higher cost structure)
  • - Members Per Employee (MPE): Bottom 8.6% in tier

Core Metrics

As of 2025-Q4

Metric Current vs Tier Tier Avg State Avg (NY) National Avg Tier Percentile
Members 251,872
+0.9% YoY-0.4% QoQ
-40.5K 292,342
-2.4% YoY
26,134
+5.1% YoY
33,374
+5.7% YoY
26%
Assets $5.3B
+1.2% YoY+1.7% QoQ
$-459.0M $5.7B
-0.2% YoY
$482.3M
+7.4% YoY
$561.6M
+9.7% YoY
29%
Loans $3.5B
+0.4% YoY+1.3% QoQ
$-703.1M $4.2B
-1.6% YoY
$324.6M
+7.8% YoY
$397.0M
+8.8% YoY
Bottom 11.4% in tier
Deposits $4.6B
+2.3% YoY+2.3% QoQ
$-281.3M $4.8B
+0.4% YoY
$411.3M
+7.7% YoY
$477.3M
+9.7% YoY
43%

See Your Full Scorecard

Unlock complete metrics, rankings, and AI-powered insights — always free

Tier 1
50+ financial metrics with peer benchmarks
Performance signatures (strengths & concerns)
AI-generated insights and rankings

Want to see an example first? Preview Navy Federal's scorecard →

ROA 0.4%
+258.4% YoY-5.4% QoQ
-0.4% 0.8%
+27.9% YoY
0.7%
+147.7% YoY
0.7%
+15.9% YoY
Bottom 11.4% in tier
NIM 2.9%
+9.0% YoY+1.1% QoQ
-0.1% 3.0%
+8.0% YoY
3.6%
+4.1% YoY
3.8%
+5.1% YoY
37%
Efficiency Ratio 80.6%
-9.6% YoY-1.1% QoQ
+13.3% 67.3%
-3.7% YoY
80.7%
-3.4% YoY
79.7%
-3.3% YoY
Top 8.6% in tier
Delinquency Rate 0.7%
+31.3% YoY-1.2% QoQ
-0.1 0.8%
+17.5% YoY
1.6%
-19.7% YoY
1.3%
-2.1% YoY
51%
Loan To Share 75.8%
-1.8% YoY-0.9% QoQ
-10.1% 85.9%
-2.6% YoY
60.4%
-2.5% YoY
67.4%
-1.7% YoY
20%
AMR $31,874
+0.5% YoY+2.2% QoQ
$-2K $34,289
+3.5% YoY
$19,178
-21.9% YoY
$19,687
+2.0% YoY
54%
CD Concentration 27.6%
+2.0% YoY-0.2% QoQ
-1.6% 29.1% 16.3% 19.8% 40%
Indirect Auto % 2.7%
-27.6% YoY-9.0% QoQ
-14.4% 17.1% 2.6% 7.8% 19%

Signature Analysis

Strengths (2)

Organic Growth Leader

growth
#28 of 29 • Top 96.4% in tier

Attracting members (0.5-50% YoY) without heavy indirect auto dependency (<20%). Healthy, sustainable growth model.

Why This Signature
Member Growth (YoY): 0.93%
(Tier: 4.35%, National: 4.32%)
but worse than tier avg
Indirect Auto %: 2.68%
(Tier: 17.09%, National: 7.78%)
better than tier avg
29 of 68 Large CUs have this signature | 609 nationally
→ No prior data (29 CUs now) | New qualifier

Organic Growth Engine

growth
#54 of 54 • Top 100.0% in tier

Growing membership while maintaining profitability. Healthy fundamentals in place.

Why This Signature
Member Growth (YoY): 0.93%
(Tier: 4.35%, National: 4.32%)
but worse than tier avg
Return on Assets: 0.38%
(Tier: 0.90%, National: 0.67%)
but worse than tier avg
Indirect Auto %: 2.68%
(Tier: 17.09%, National: 7.78%)
better than tier avg
54 of 68 Large CUs have this signature | 913 nationally
→ No prior data (54 CUs now) | New qualifier

Concerns (2)

Credit Quality Pressure

risk
#7 of 37 • Bottom 16.7% in tier

Delinquencies are rising year-over-year. Credit risk is building - they may need better underwriting tools.

Why This Signature
Delinquency Change (YoY): 0.16% points
(Tier: 0.04% points, National: 0.06% points)
worse than tier avg
37 of 68 Large CUs have this signature | 969 nationally
→ Stable (41→37 CUs) -4 CUs YoY | New qualifier

Efficiency Drag

risk
#3 of 4 • Bottom 66.7% in tier

High efficiency ratio (>80%) indicates elevated operating costs relative to revenue. Margin improvement opportunities may exist.

Why This Signature
Efficiency Ratio: 80.55%
(Tier: 65.89%, National: 79.67%)
worse than tier avg
ROA Change (YoY): 0.27% points
(Tier: 0.17% points, National: 0.02% points)
but better than tier avg
Member Growth (YoY): 0.93%
(Tier: 4.35%, National: 4.32%)
worse than tier avg
4 of 68 Large CUs have this signature | 633 nationally
→ Stable (8→4 CUs) -4 CUs YoY

Metric Rankings

See how this credit union ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.

Strengths: Metrics in the top 25% (75th percentile or higher) Concerns: Metrics in the bottom 25% (25th percentile or lower)

Comparing against 35 peers in tier

Top Strengths (0 metrics)

No strength rankings available

Top Weaknesses (9 metrics)

33
Efficiency Ratio
profitability
Value: 80.55%
Peer Median: -
#33 of 35 Bottom 8.6% in 5B-7B tier
33
Members Per Employee (MPE)
engagement
Value: 286.544
Peer Median: -
#33 of 35 Bottom 8.6% in 5B-7B tier
31
Return on Assets (ROA)
profitability
Value: 0.38%
Peer Median: -
#31 of 35 Bottom 14.3% in 5B-7B tier
31
Deposit Growth Rate
growth
Value: 2.28%
Peer Median: -
#31 of 35 Bottom 14.3% in 5B-7B tier
31
Total Loans
balance_sheet
Value: $3.46B
Peer Median: -
#31 of 35 Bottom 14.3% in 5B-7B tier
30
Asset Growth Rate
growth
Value: 1.15%
Peer Median: -
#30 of 35 Bottom 17.1% in 5B-7B tier
30
Loan Growth Rate
growth
Value: 0.43%
Peer Median: -
#30 of 35 Bottom 17.1% in 5B-7B tier
28
AMR Growth Rate
growth
Value: 0.54%
Peer Median: -
#28 of 35 Bottom 22.9% in 5B-7B tier
28
Loan-to-Share Ratio
balance_sheet
Value: 75.82%
Peer Median: -
#28 of 35 Bottom 22.9% in 5B-7B tier
Link copied to clipboard!