BlastPoint's Credit Union Scorecard
U. T.
Charter #19448 · TN
U. T. has 7 strengths but faces 10 concerns
How does the industry compare?
What's your peer group doing?
How does TN stack up?
Key Strengths
Areas where this CU excels compared to peers
- + Relationship Depth Leader: Top 17.2% in tier
- + Credit Quality Leader: Top 31.6% in tier
- + Wallet Share Momentum: Top 36.0% in tier
- + Total Delinquency Rate (60+ days): Top 4.1% in tier
- + Loan-to-Member Ratio (LMR): Top 6.5% in tier
- + Loan-to-Share Ratio: Top 8.9% in tier
- + Average Member Relationship (AMR): Top 9.5% in tier
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - Liquidity Strain: Bottom 6.3% in tier
- - Indirect Auto Dependency: Bottom 9.3% in tier
- - Efficiency Drag: Bottom 18.2% in tier
- - Credit Risk Growth: Bottom 19.8% in tier
- - Stagnation Risk: Bottom 20.1% in tier
- - Credit Quality Pressure: Bottom 23.3% in tier
- - Membership Headwinds: Bottom 27.0% in tier
- - ROA 0.13% below tier average
- - Efficiency ratio 2.06% above tier (higher cost structure)
- - Total Members: Bottom 8.9% in tier
Core Metrics
As of 2025-Q3
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (TN) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Members |
25,779
-1.2% YoY+0.1% QoQ
|
-14.0K |
39,752
-2.7% YoY
|
21,139
+4.9% YoY
|
33,089
+6.1% YoY
|
Bottom 8.3% in tier |
| Assets |
$551.8M
+5.7% YoY+3.2% QoQ
|
$-70.6M |
$622.4M
+0.3% YoY
|
$362.5M
+9.5% YoY
|
$547.7M
+7.8% YoY
|
22% |
| Loans |
$467.4M
+7.6% YoY+3.7% QoQ
|
+$31.5M |
$435.9M
-0.4% YoY
|
$271.1M
+9.1% YoY
|
$388.7M
+8.6% YoY
|
64% |
| Deposits |
$471.4M
+7.2% YoY+3.9% QoQ
|
$-66.6M |
$538.0M
+1.3% YoY
|
$303.0M
+8.7% YoY
|
$464.6M
+9.3% YoY
|
18% |
See Your Full Scorecard
Unlock complete metrics, rankings, and AI-powered insights — always free
✓ Check your email for the access link!
Want to see an example first? Preview Navy Federal's scorecard →
| ROA |
0.5%
+20.2% YoY+0.4% QoQ
|
-0.1% |
0.7%
+33.9% YoY
|
0.8%
+4.1% YoY
|
0.7%
+273.4% YoY
|
43% |
| NIM |
3.4%
+14.1% YoY+2.9% QoQ
|
-0.1% |
3.4%
+8.6% YoY
|
3.8%
+5.1% YoY
|
3.7%
+5.0% YoY
|
43% |
| Efficiency Ratio |
80.2%
+2.6% YoY-0.5% QoQ
|
+2.1% |
78.1%
-3.4% YoY
|
75.4%
-1.8% YoY
|
79.1%
-3.3% YoY
|
59% |
| Delinquency Rate |
0.2%
+49.3% YoY+70.0% QoQ
|
-0.6 |
0.8%
-4.9% YoY
|
1.1%
+8.5% YoY
|
1.2%
-0.9% YoY
|
Bottom 4.1% in tier |
| Loan To Share |
99.2%
+0.4% YoY-0.2% QoQ
|
+18.1% |
81.0%
-1.8% YoY
|
70.4%
-2.4% YoY
|
68.0%
-1.7% YoY
|
Top 9.5% in tier |
| AMR |
$36,418
+8.7% YoY+3.6% QoQ
|
+$10K |
$26,482
+2.6% YoY
|
$18,470
+2.4% YoY
|
$19,418
+1.3% YoY
|
Top 10.1% in tier |
| CD Concentration |
32.0%
+1.2% YoY-3.3% QoQ
|
+7.6% |
24.4%
+4.2% YoY
|
22.3%
+6.6% YoY
|
19.6%
+6.2% YoY
|
77% |
| Indirect Auto % |
27.6%
-8.7% YoY-2.0% QoQ
|
+13.6% |
14.0%
-5.7% YoY
|
6.9%
+1.1% YoY
|
7.9%
-2.9% YoY
|
80% |
Signature Analysis
Strengths (3)
Relationship Depth Leader
growthTop-tier average member relationship within peer group, with stable or growing engagement. Strong wallet share positioning.
Credit Quality Leader
growthBest-in-class credit quality (delinquency in bottom 25% of peer group). Conservative underwriting paying off.
Wallet Share Momentum
growthAverage member relationship growing 5%+ year-over-year. Members are significantly deepening their engagement.
Concerns (7)
Liquidity Strain
riskLoan demand outpacing deposits. They're bumping against liquidity limits - need funding solutions.
Indirect Auto Dependency
riskSignificant portion of loan portfolio in indirect auto (>15%). This concentration creates dependency on dealer relationships.
Efficiency Drag
riskHigh efficiency ratio (>80%) indicates elevated operating costs relative to revenue. Margin improvement opportunities may exist.
Credit Risk Growth
riskLoan portfolio growing while delinquencies are rising. Expansion with deteriorating credit quality needs attention.
Stagnation Risk
riskMembership declining year-over-year. Shrinking member base creates long-term risk even if current operations appear healthy.
Credit Quality Pressure
riskDelinquencies are rising year-over-year. Credit risk is building - they may need better underwriting tools.
Membership Headwinds
declineMembership declining year-over-year. They need solutions to stop the bleeding before it impacts revenue.
Metric Rankings
See how this credit union ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.
Strengths: Metrics in the top 25% (75th percentile or higher) Concerns: Metrics in the bottom 25% (25th percentile or lower)