BlastPoint's Credit Union Scorecard
PROPONENT
Charter #20448 · NJ
PROPONENT has 5 strengths but faces 16 concerns
How does the industry compare?
What's your peer group doing?
How does NJ stack up?
Key Strengths
Areas where this CU excels compared to peers
- + Net Interest Margin 0.09% above tier average
- + Indirect Auto Concentration (%): Top 0.0% in tier
- + Average Member Relationship (AMR): Top 2.4% in tier
- + Loan-to-Member Ratio (LMR): Top 2.4% in tier
- + Net Worth Ratio: Top 8.5% in tier
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - Efficiency Drag: Bottom 4.1% in tier
- - Deposit Outflow: Bottom 48.5% in tier
- - Stagnation Risk: Bottom 66.2% in tier
- - Shrinking Wallet Share: Bottom 75.8% in tier
- - Institutional Decline: Bottom 77.4% in tier
- - Liquidity Strain: Bottom 85.0% in tier
- - Accelerating Exit Risk: Bottom 92.7% in tier
- - Membership Headwinds: Bottom 97.3% in tier
- - ROA 0.56% below tier average
- - Efficiency ratio 14.73% above tier (higher cost structure)
- - Delinquency rate 0.09% above tier average
- - Total Deposits: Bottom 2.4% in tier
- - Total Members: Bottom 3.6% in tier
- - Total Assets: Bottom 5.5% in tier
- - First Mortgage Concentration (%): Bottom 7.9% in tier
- - Share Certificate Concentration (%): Bottom 8.5% in tier
Core Metrics
As of 2025-Q4
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (NJ) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Members |
18,623
-0.6% YoY-0.4% QoQ
|
-20.0K |
38,575
-4.8% YoY
|
7,445
+8.1% YoY
|
33,374
+5.7% YoY
|
Bottom 3.0% in tier |
| Assets |
$508.3M
-1.1% YoY-0.1% QoQ
|
$-113.5M |
$621.7M
+0.1% YoY
|
$121.0M
+10.8% YoY
|
$561.6M
+9.7% YoY
|
Bottom 4.8% in tier |
| Loans |
$398.0M
-2.7% YoY-0.1% QoQ
|
$-31.9M |
$429.8M
-1.8% YoY
|
$75.4M
+12.2% YoY
|
$397.0M
+8.8% YoY
|
32% |
| Deposits |
$425.5M
-1.3% YoY+0.0% QoQ
|
$-113.2M |
$538.7M
+0.6% YoY
|
$102.3M
+10.2% YoY
|
$477.3M
+9.7% YoY
|
Bottom 1.8% in tier |
See Your Full Scorecard
Unlock complete metrics, rankings, and AI-powered insights — always free
✓ Check your email for the access link!
Want to see an example first? Preview Navy Federal's scorecard →
| ROA |
0.1%
-58.9% YoY+299.0% QoQ
|
-0.6% |
0.7%
+42.9% YoY
|
0.5%
+267.0% YoY
|
0.7%
+15.9% YoY
|
Bottom 10.3% in tier |
| NIM |
3.5%
+7.3% YoY+1.6% QoQ
|
+0.1% |
3.4%
+8.0% YoY
|
3.7%
+5.0% YoY
|
3.8%
+5.1% YoY
|
57% |
| Efficiency Ratio |
92.2%
+5.9% YoY+0.2% QoQ
|
+14.7% |
77.5%
-4.1% YoY
|
84.3%
-19.5% YoY
|
79.7%
-3.3% YoY
|
Top 4.2% in tier |
| Delinquency Rate |
0.9%
-25.4% YoY-14.4% QoQ
|
+0.1 |
0.8%
-1.1% YoY
|
1.7%
-6.9% YoY
|
1.3%
-2.1% YoY
|
70% |
| Loan To Share |
93.5%
-1.5% YoY-0.1% QoQ
|
+13.7% |
79.8%
-2.3% YoY
|
53.4%
-2.5% YoY
|
67.4%
-1.7% YoY
|
85% |
| AMR |
$44,216
-1.4% YoY+0.3% QoQ
|
+$17K |
$26,849
+2.7% YoY
|
$16,460
+2.2% YoY
|
$19,687
+2.0% YoY
|
Top 3.0% in tier |
| CD Concentration |
38.6%
-1.9% YoY-2.4% QoQ
|
+14.1% | 24.4% | 14.4% | 19.8% | Top 9.4% in tier |
| Indirect Auto % | 0.0% | -13.8% | 13.8% | 1.0% | 7.8% | Bottom 0.0% in tier |
Signature Analysis
Strengths (0)
Concerns (8)
Efficiency Drag
riskHigh efficiency ratio (>80%) indicates elevated operating costs relative to revenue. Margin improvement opportunities may exist.
Deposit Outflow
declineMembers staying (>= -1% YoY) but deposits leaving. They're moving money to higher-yield competitors - rate pressure is real.
Stagnation Risk
riskMembership shrinking at least 0.5% year-over-year. Declining member base creates long-term risk even if current operations appear healthy.
Shrinking Wallet Share
declineAverage member relationship declining year-over-year. Members may be moving money elsewhere or reducing engagement.
Institutional Decline
declineBoth members and loans declining - the institution is contracting. Leadership is likely under pressure to reverse course.
Liquidity Strain
riskLoan demand outpacing deposits. They're bumping against liquidity limits - need funding solutions.
Accelerating Exit Risk
declineMembers leaving AND taking more deposits with them. This compounds quickly - urgent need for retention strategy.
Membership Headwinds
declineMembership declining year-over-year. They need solutions to stop the bleeding before it impacts revenue.
Metric Rankings
See how this credit union ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.
Strengths: Metrics in the top 25% (75th percentile or higher) Concerns: Metrics in the bottom 25% (25th percentile or lower)