BlastPoint's Credit Union Scorecard
LOS ANGELES POLICE
Charter #24553 · CA
LOS ANGELES POLICE has 3 strengths but faces 8 concerns
How does the industry compare?
What's your peer group doing?
How does CA stack up?
Key Strengths
Areas where this CU excels compared to peers
- + Organic Growth Leader: Top 46.1% in tier
- + Organic Growth Engine: Top 75.2% in tier
- + Average Member Relationship (AMR): Top 8.6% in tier
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - Efficiency Drag: Bottom 14.6% in tier
- - Credit Quality Pressure: Bottom 52.9% in tier
- - Credit Risk Growth: Bottom 85.3% in tier
- - Shrinking Wallet Share: Bottom 94.9% in tier
- - ROA 0.52% below tier average
- - Efficiency ratio 14.47% above tier (higher cost structure)
- - Total Members: Bottom 4.6% in tier
- - Loan-to-Share Ratio: Bottom 9.9% in tier
Core Metrics
As of 2025-Q4
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (CA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Members |
48,818
+4.2% YoY+0.9% QoQ
|
-48.6K |
97,431
-2.4% YoY
|
60,320
+5.7% YoY
|
33,374
+5.7% YoY
|
Bottom 4.3% in tier |
| Assets |
$1.4B
+2.6% YoY-0.9% QoQ
|
$-359.6M |
$1.7B
+0.9% YoY
|
$1.3B
+6.2% YoY
|
$561.6M
+9.7% YoY
|
34% |
| Loans |
$766.5M
+1.1% YoY+1.0% QoQ
|
$-467.9M |
$1.2B
+0.5% YoY
|
$856.7M
+6.3% YoY
|
$397.0M
+8.8% YoY
|
Bottom 11.6% in tier |
| Deposits |
$1.2B
+4.9% YoY-1.0% QoQ
|
$-234.7M |
$1.5B
+0.9% YoY
|
$1.1B
+7.1% YoY
|
$477.3M
+9.7% YoY
|
42% |
See Your Full Scorecard
Unlock complete metrics, rankings, and AI-powered insights — always free
✓ Check your email for the access link!
Want to see an example first? Preview Navy Federal's scorecard →
| ROA |
0.2%
-27.3% YoY-35.0% QoQ
|
-0.5% |
0.7%
+20.9% YoY
|
0.5%
+14.3% YoY
|
0.7%
+15.9% YoY
|
Bottom 8.3% in tier |
| NIM |
3.2%
+1.3% YoY-0.9% QoQ
|
-0.0% |
3.3%
+9.2% YoY
|
3.3%
+7.0% YoY
|
3.8%
+5.1% YoY
|
45% |
| Efficiency Ratio |
88.5%
-0.3% YoY+1.6% QoQ
|
+14.5% |
74.1%
-9.5% YoY
|
80.7%
-1.8% YoY
|
79.7%
-3.3% YoY
|
Top 4.0% in tier |
| Delinquency Rate |
0.7%
+22.8% YoY+6.9% QoQ
|
-0.2 |
0.9%
+6.2% YoY
|
0.7%
-40.0% YoY
|
1.3%
-2.1% YoY
|
40% |
| Loan To Share |
62.6%
-3.7% YoY+2.0% QoQ
|
-22.2% |
84.8%
-0.8% YoY
|
68.6%
-1.3% YoY
|
67.4%
-1.7% YoY
|
Bottom 9.6% in tier |
| AMR |
$40,788
-0.7% YoY-1.1% QoQ
|
+$11K |
$29,428
+2.4% YoY
|
$28,728
+2.4% YoY
|
$19,687
+2.0% YoY
|
Top 8.9% in tier |
| CD Concentration |
28.5%
-1.5% YoY+1.2% QoQ
|
-0.5% | 29.0% | 21.7% | 19.8% | 50% |
| Indirect Auto % |
5.6%
-7.9% YoY+11.6% QoQ
|
-12.7% | 18.3% | 9.2% | 7.8% | 26% |
Signature Analysis
Strengths (2)
Organic Growth Leader
growthAttracting members (0.5-50% YoY) without heavy indirect auto dependency (<20%). Healthy, sustainable growth model.
Organic Growth Engine
growthGrowing membership while maintaining profitability. Healthy fundamentals in place.
Concerns (4)
Efficiency Drag
riskHigh efficiency ratio (>80%) indicates elevated operating costs relative to revenue. Margin improvement opportunities may exist.
Credit Quality Pressure
riskDelinquencies are rising year-over-year. Credit risk is building - they may need better underwriting tools.
Credit Risk Growth
riskLoan portfolio growing while delinquencies are rising. Expansion with deteriorating credit quality needs attention.
Shrinking Wallet Share
declineAverage member relationship declining year-over-year. Members may be moving money elsewhere or reducing engagement.
Metric Rankings
See how this credit union ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.
Strengths: Metrics in the top 25% (75th percentile or higher) Concerns: Metrics in the bottom 25% (25th percentile or lower)