✦ Missed CU Wrapped 2025? Read the full Year in Review →

BlastPoint's Credit Union Scorecard

COASTHILLS

Charter #24957 · CA

Mid-Market 1B-3B
300 CUs in 1B-3B nationally 37 in CA
View Mid-Market leaderboard →

COASTHILLS has 1 strength but faces 6 concerns

Key Strengths

Areas where this CU excels compared to peers

  • + Net Interest Margin 0.16% above tier average

Key Concerns

Areas that may need attention

  • - Shrinking Wallet Share: Bottom 85.8% in tier
  • - Indirect Auto Dependency: Bottom 89.5% in tier
  • - ROA 0.80% below tier average
  • - Efficiency ratio 4.56% above tier (higher cost structure)
  • - Net Worth Ratio: Bottom 2.7% in tier
  • - Net Charge-Off Rate: Bottom 3.3% in tier

NEW · Q2 2026 RECAP

Your Quarter, Wrapped

A 35-second highlight reel of your Q2 2026 — the wins worth celebrating and the one signal worth watching, pulled straight from your scorecard data.

Q2 2026 at a glance

  • One of 300 credit unions with $1B-$3B in assets nationally, and 1 of 37 that size in California.
  • Shares and deposits +2.3% year over year ($1.50B in shares and deposits).
  • Membership: 84,724 members, +4.5% vs a year ago.
  • Delinquency rate 0.67%.
  • Return on assets 0.02%.
  • Efficiency ratio 77.58% vs a 73.02% peer average.
  • Loan-to-share ratio 88.39% vs a 84.71% peer average.

Data period: Q2 2026 NCUA call report. Animation disabled (reduced-motion preference). Full details in the metrics table below.

Core Metrics

As of 2026-Q2

Metric Current vs Tier Tier Avg State Avg (CA) National Avg Tier Percentile
Members 84,724
+4.5% YoY+0.9% QoQ
-12.1K 96,861
-1.9% YoY
67,400
+7.3% YoY
34,678
+6.6% YoY
48%
Assets $1.8B
-0.5% YoY+0.1% QoQ
+$41.9M $1.7B
+0.4% YoY
$1.4B
+10.3% YoY
$593.1M
+10.2% YoY
61%
Loans $1.3B
+3.7% YoY+3.5% QoQ
+$92.0M $1.2B
+0.7% YoY
$958.9M
+10.2% YoY
$418.6M
+10.1% YoY
65%
Deposits $1.5B
+2.3% YoY+0.7% QoQ
+$37.0M $1.5B
+0.5% YoY
$1.2B
+11.1% YoY
$504.8M
+10.3% YoY
60%

See Your Full Scorecard

Unlock complete metrics, rankings, and AI-powered insights — always free

Tier 1
50+ financial metrics with peer benchmarks
Performance signatures (strengths & concerns)
AI-generated insights and rankings

Want to see an example first? Preview Navy Federal's scorecard →

ROA 0.0%
-91.7% YoY-110.3% QoQ
-0.8% 0.8%
+27.6% YoY
2.5%
+328.4% YoY
1.2%
+121.4% YoY
Bottom 0.1% in tier
NIM 3.6%
+19.1% YoY+1.5% QoQ
+0.2% 3.4%
+6.6% YoY
3.4%
+4.4% YoY
3.8%
+2.3% YoY
60%
Efficiency Ratio 77.6%
+1.6% YoY-5.4% QoQ
+4.6% 73.0%
-2.7% YoY
79.7%
-4.5% YoY
83.0%
-5.3% YoY
68%
Delinquency Rate 0.7%
-52.4% YoY+13.9% QoQ
-0.2 0.9%
+7.3% YoY
0.7%
-14.3% YoY
1.3%
+2.6% YoY
47%
Loan To Share 88.4%
+1.3% YoY+2.7% QoQ
+3.7% 84.7%
+0.1% YoY
69.0%
+0.5% YoY
66.4%
-1.4% YoY
53%
AMR $33,363
-1.5% YoY+1.1% QoQ
+$4K $29,575
+1.5% YoY
$29,171
+2.5% YoY
$20,028
-0.9% YoY
78%
CD Concentration 33.8%
-1.9% YoY-0.6% QoQ
+4.7% 29.1% 22.2% 20.0% 71%
Indirect Auto % 26.5%
+1.7% YoY-0.9% QoQ
+8.4% 18.1% 9.2% 7.7% 72%

Signature Analysis

Strengths (0)

No strengths identified

Concerns (2)

Shrinking Wallet Share

decline
#54 of 69 • Bottom 85.8% in tier

Average member relationship declining year-over-year. Members may be moving money elsewhere or reducing engagement.

Why This Signature
AMR Growth (YoY): -1.50%
(Tier: 3.62%, National: 35.20%)
worse than tier avg
69 of 377 Mid-Market CUs have this signature | 308 nationally
↓ Shrinking -22 CUs YoY | Rank worsening

Indirect Auto Dependency

risk
#180 of 193 • Bottom 89.5% in tier

Significant portion of loan portfolio in indirect auto (>15%). This concentration creates dependency on dealer relationships.

Why This Signature
Asset Growth (YoY): -0.50%
(Tier: 6.52%, National: 3.30%)
worse than tier avg
Indirect Auto %: 26.53%
(Tier: 18.08%, National: 7.71%)
worse than tier avg
Member Growth (YoY): 4.54%
(Tier: 3.16%, National: 15.67%)
but better than tier avg
193 of 377 Mid-Market CUs have this signature | 714 nationally
↓ Shrinking -10 CUs YoY | Rank improving

Metric Rankings

See how this credit union ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.

Strengths: Metrics in the top 25% (75th percentile or higher) Concerns: Metrics in the bottom 25% (25th percentile or lower)

Comparing against 300 peers in tier

Top Strengths (4 metrics)

61
Loan-to-Member Ratio (LMR)
engagement
Value: $15,654
Peer Median: $12,809
#61 of 300 Top 20.0% in 1B-3B tier
66
Member Growth Rate
growth
Value: 4.54%
Peer Median: 1.84%
#66 of 300 Top 21.7% in 1B-3B tier
67
Average Member Relationship (AMR)
engagement
Value: $33,363
Peer Median: $28,089
#67 of 300 Top 22.0% in 1B-3B tier
72
First Mortgage Concentration (%)
balance_sheet
Value: 22.84%
Peer Median: 33.59%
#72 of 300 Top 23.7% in 1B-3B tier

Top Weaknesses (6 metrics)

300
Return on Assets (ROA)
profitability
Value: 0.02%
Peer Median: 0.77%
#300 of 300 Bottom 0.3% in 1B-3B tier
293
Net Worth Ratio
risk
Value: 8.00%
Peer Median: 10.91%
#293 of 300 Bottom 2.7% in 1B-3B tier
291
Net Charge-Off Rate
risk
Value: 1.41%
Peer Median: 0.52%
#291 of 300 Bottom 3.3% in 1B-3B tier
266
Asset Growth Rate
growth
Value: -0.50%
Peer Median: 5.21%
#266 of 300 Bottom 11.7% in 1B-3B tier
261
Members Per Employee (MPE)
engagement
Value: 271.551
Peer Median: 346.173
#261 of 300 Bottom 13.3% in 1B-3B tier
255
AMR Growth Rate
growth
Value: -1.50%
Peer Median: 3.19%
#255 of 300 Bottom 15.3% in 1B-3B tier
Link copied to clipboard!