✦ Missed CU Wrapped 2025? Read the full Year in Review →

BlastPoint's Credit Union Scorecard

BLACK HILLS

Charter #4365 · SD

Mid-Market 1B-3B
300 CUs in 1B-3B nationally 1 in SD
View Mid-Market leaderboard →

BLACK HILLS faces 6 concerns requiring attention

Key Strengths

Areas where this CU excels compared to peers

No key strengths identified

Key Concerns

Areas that may need attention

  • - Efficiency Drag: Bottom 14.4% in tier
  • - Credit Quality Pressure: Bottom 22.0% in tier
  • - Indirect Auto Dependency: Bottom 41.4% in tier
  • - ROA 0.35% below tier average
  • - Efficiency ratio 9.05% above tier (higher cost structure)
  • - Delinquency rate 0.09% above tier average

NEW · Q2 2026 RECAP

Your Quarter, Wrapped

A 35-second highlight reel of your Q2 2026 — the wins worth celebrating and the one signal worth watching, pulled straight from your scorecard data.

Q2 2026 at a glance

  • One of 300 credit unions with $1B-$3B in assets nationally, and 1 of 1 that size in South Dakota.
  • Shares and deposits +5.9% year over year ($2.13B in shares and deposits).
  • Membership: 109,705 members, +2.2% vs a year ago.
  • Delinquency rate 0.95%.
  • Return on assets 0.47%.
  • Efficiency ratio 82.07% vs a 73.02% peer average.
  • Loan-to-share ratio 77.70% vs a 84.71% peer average.

Data period: Q2 2026 NCUA call report. Animation disabled (reduced-motion preference). Full details in the metrics table below.

Core Metrics

As of 2026-Q2

Metric Current vs Tier Tier Avg State Avg (SD) National Avg Tier Percentile
Members 109,705
+2.2% YoY+0.8% QoQ
+12.8K 96,861
-1.9% YoY
10,596
+0.4% YoY
34,678
+6.6% YoY
68%
Assets $2.4B
+6.1% YoY+0.2% QoQ
+$653.8M $1.7B
+0.4% YoY
$187.3M
+5.8% YoY
$593.1M
+10.2% YoY
80%
Loans $1.7B
-0.9% YoY+0.1% QoQ
+$421.1M $1.2B
+0.7% YoY
$126.7M
+3.4% YoY
$418.6M
+10.1% YoY
80%
Deposits $2.1B
+5.9% YoY+0.1% QoQ
+$667.0M $1.5B
+0.5% YoY
$165.1M
+5.0% YoY
$504.8M
+10.3% YoY
Top 14.3% in tier

See Your Full Scorecard

Unlock complete metrics, rankings, and AI-powered insights — always free

Tier 1
50+ financial metrics with peer benchmarks
Performance signatures (strengths & concerns)
AI-generated insights and rankings

Want to see an example first? Preview Navy Federal's scorecard →

ROA 0.5%
+2.8% YoY+13.7% QoQ
-0.4% 0.8%
+27.6% YoY
1.2%
+16.4% YoY
1.2%
+121.4% YoY
21%
NIM 3.2%
+0.8% YoY+1.3% QoQ
-0.2% 3.4%
+6.6% YoY
4.3%
+7.8% YoY
3.8%
+2.3% YoY
32%
Efficiency Ratio 82.1%
-0.1% YoY-0.6% QoQ
+9.1% 73.0%
-2.7% YoY
77.2%
-0.2% YoY
83.0%
-5.3% YoY
85%
Delinquency Rate 1.0%
+22.7% YoY+37.1% QoQ
+0.1 0.9%
+7.3% YoY
1.0%
+21.8% YoY
1.3%
+2.6% YoY
70%
Loan To Share 77.7%
-6.4% YoY+0.0% QoQ
-7.0% 84.7%
+0.1% YoY
72.5%
-0.5% YoY
66.4%
-1.4% YoY
24%
AMR $34,507
+0.6% YoY-0.7% QoQ
+$5K $29,575
+1.5% YoY
$22,000
+3.5% YoY
$20,028
-0.9% YoY
80%
CD Concentration 35.1%
+2.3% YoY+1.1% QoQ
+6.0% 29.1% 29.4% 20.0% 76%
Indirect Auto % 16.4%
-8.7% YoY-2.5% QoQ
-1.7% 18.1% 8.1% 7.7% 52%

Signature Analysis

Strengths (0)

No strengths identified

Concerns (3)

Efficiency Drag

risk
#25 of 71 • Bottom 14.4% in tier

High efficiency ratio (>80%) indicates elevated operating costs relative to revenue. Margin improvement opportunities may exist.

Why This Signature
Efficiency Ratio: 82.07%
(Tier: 72.30%, National: 82.97%)
worse than tier avg
ROA Change (YoY): 0.01% points
(Tier: 0.18% points, National: 0.47% points)
worse than tier avg
Member Growth (YoY): 2.19%
(Tier: 3.16%, National: 15.67%)
worse than tier avg
71 of 377 Mid-Market CUs have this signature | 608 nationally
↓ Shrinking -33 CUs YoY | Rank improving

Credit Quality Pressure

risk
#82 of 215 • Bottom 22.0% in tier

Delinquencies are rising year-over-year. Credit risk is building - they may need better underwriting tools.

Why This Signature
Delinquency Change (YoY): 0.18% points
(Tier: 0.06% points, National: 0.08% points)
worse than tier avg
215 of 377 Mid-Market CUs have this signature | 962 nationally
↓ Shrinking -28 CUs YoY | New qualifier

Indirect Auto Dependency

risk
#159 of 193 • Bottom 41.4% in tier

Significant portion of loan portfolio in indirect auto (>15%). This concentration creates dependency on dealer relationships.

Why This Signature
Asset Growth (YoY): 6.08%
(Tier: 6.52%, National: 3.30%)
worse than tier avg
Indirect Auto %: 16.43%
(Tier: 18.08%, National: 7.71%)
but better than tier avg
Member Growth (YoY): 2.19%
(Tier: 3.16%, National: 15.67%)
worse than tier avg
193 of 377 Mid-Market CUs have this signature | 714 nationally
↓ Shrinking -10 CUs YoY | Rank improving

Metric Rankings

See how this credit union ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.

Strengths: Metrics in the top 25% (75th percentile or higher) Concerns: Metrics in the bottom 25% (25th percentile or lower)

Comparing against 300 peers in tier

Top Strengths (5 metrics)

43
Total Deposits
balance_sheet
Value: $2.13B
Peer Median: $1.30B
#43 of 300 Top 14.0% in 1B-3B tier
59
Total Assets
balance_sheet
Value: $2.38B
Peer Median: $1.51B
#59 of 300 Top 19.3% in 1B-3B tier
59
Average Member Relationship (AMR)
engagement
Value: $34,507
Peer Median: $28,089
#59 of 300 Top 19.3% in 1B-3B tier
60
Fee Income Per Member
profitability
Value: $271.25
Peer Median: $204.73
#60 of 300 Top 19.7% in 1B-3B tier
61
Total Loans
balance_sheet
Value: $1.66B
Peer Median: $1.14B
#61 of 300 Top 20.0% in 1B-3B tier

Top Weaknesses (6 metrics)

256
Loan Growth Rate
growth
Value: -0.85%
Peer Median: 5.71%
#256 of 300 Bottom 15.0% in 1B-3B tier
255
Efficiency Ratio
profitability
Value: 82.07%
Peer Median: 73.62%
#255 of 300 Bottom 15.3% in 1B-3B tier
255
Members Per Employee (MPE)
engagement
Value: 279.148
Peer Median: 346.173
#255 of 300 Bottom 15.3% in 1B-3B tier
238
Return on Assets (ROA)
profitability
Value: 0.47%
Peer Median: 0.77%
#238 of 300 Bottom 21.0% in 1B-3B tier
237
Share Certificate Concentration (%)
balance_sheet
Value: 35.11%
Peer Median: 28.24%
#237 of 300 Bottom 21.3% in 1B-3B tier
227
Loan-to-Share Ratio
balance_sheet
Value: 77.70%
Peer Median: 87.07%
#227 of 300 Bottom 24.7% in 1B-3B tier
Link copied to clipboard!