BlastPoint's Credit Union Scorecard
ANDREWS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Charter #5754 · MD
ANDREWS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION has 3 strengths but faces 8 concerns
How does the industry compare?
What's your peer group doing?
How does MD stack up?
Key Strengths
Areas where this CU excels compared to peers
- + Strong member growth: 7.9% YoY
- + Total Loans: Top 7.2% in tier
- + Members Per Employee (MPE): Top 8.2% in tier
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - Liquidity Strain: Bottom 12.5% in tier
- - Efficiency Drag: Bottom 19.1% in tier
- - Credit Risk Growth: Bottom 36.3% in tier
- - Credit Quality Pressure: Bottom 37.9% in tier
- - Indirect Auto Dependency: Bottom 56.6% in tier
- - Shrinking Wallet Share: Bottom 87.9% in tier
- - ROA 0.36% below tier average
- - Efficiency ratio 7.60% above tier (higher cost structure)
Core Metrics
As of 2026-Q1
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (MD) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Members |
153,258
+7.9% YoY+2.8% QoQ
|
+57.2K |
96,048
-2.7% YoY
|
35,042
+5.0% YoY
|
33,913
+5.7% YoY
|
Top 10.5% in tier |
| Assets |
$2.6B
+4.4% YoY+0.5% QoQ
|
+$862.4M |
$1.7B
+0.4% YoY
|
$654.4M
+9.6% YoY
|
$578.3M
+9.0% YoY
|
Top 12.4% in tier |
| Loans |
$2.0B
+7.7% YoY+2.7% QoQ
|
+$777.5M |
$1.2B
+0.2% YoY
|
$458.0M
+7.3% YoY
|
$402.4M
+8.7% YoY
|
Top 7.5% in tier |
| Deposits |
$2.0B
+3.7% YoY+2.6% QoQ
|
+$532.8M |
$1.5B
+0.5% YoY
|
$558.1M
+9.3% YoY
|
$494.3M
+9.1% YoY
|
80% |
See Your Full Scorecard
Unlock complete metrics, rankings, and AI-powered insights — always free
✓ Check your email for the access link!
Want to see an example first? Preview Navy Federal's scorecard →
| ROA |
0.4%
+10.5% YoY-29.3% QoQ
|
-0.4% |
0.7%
+27.6% YoY
|
0.5%
+20.2% YoY
|
0.4%
-39.2% YoY
|
21% |
| NIM |
2.6%
-0.9% YoY+1.1% QoQ
|
-0.8% |
3.4%
+6.2% YoY
|
3.4%
+2.6% YoY
|
3.8%
+4.1% YoY
|
Bottom 9.2% in tier |
| Efficiency Ratio |
82.2%
+2.0% YoY+6.5% QoQ
|
+7.6% |
74.6%
-3.0% YoY
|
82.5%
-2.2% YoY
|
84.6%
+2.8% YoY
|
79% |
| Delinquency Rate |
1.4%
+5.7% YoY-19.4% QoQ
|
+0.6 |
0.8%
+6.9% YoY
|
1.2%
+17.1% YoY
|
1.2%
+3.4% YoY
|
Bottom 8.5% in tier |
| Loan To Share |
99.6%
+3.8% YoY+0.0% QoQ
|
+16.5% |
83.2%
-0.4% YoY
|
63.5%
+1.0% YoY
|
65.6%
-1.4% YoY
|
Top 11.1% in tier |
| AMR |
$26,032
-2.1% YoY-0.1% QoQ
|
$-4K |
$29,652
+2.3% YoY
|
$21,172
+3.9% YoY
|
$19,920
+1.6% YoY
|
36% |
| CD Concentration |
29.3%
-14.5% YoY-6.1% QoQ
|
+0.4% | 28.8% | 21.1% | 19.8% | 54% |
| Indirect Auto % |
21.0%
+73.5% YoY+15.5% QoQ
|
+3.0% | 18.1% | 7.3% | 7.7% | 62% |
Signature Analysis
Strengths (0)
Concerns (6)
Liquidity Strain
riskLoan demand outpacing deposits. They're bumping against liquidity limits - need funding solutions.
Credit Risk Growth
riskLoan portfolio growing while delinquencies are rising. Expansion with deteriorating credit quality needs attention.
Shrinking Wallet Share
declineAverage member relationship declining year-over-year. Members may be moving money elsewhere or reducing engagement.
Credit Quality Pressure
riskDelinquencies are rising year-over-year. Credit risk is building - they may need better underwriting tools.
Efficiency Drag
riskHigh efficiency ratio (>80%) indicates elevated operating costs relative to revenue. Margin improvement opportunities may exist.
Indirect Auto Dependency
riskSignificant portion of loan portfolio in indirect auto (>15%). This concentration creates dependency on dealer relationships.
Metric Rankings
See how this credit union ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.
Strengths: Metrics in the top 25% (75th percentile or higher) Concerns: Metrics in the bottom 25% (25th percentile or lower)