BlastPoint's Credit Union Scorecard

METRO

Charter #66364 · MA

Mid-Market 3B-5B
76 CUs in 3B-5B nationally 2 in MA
View Mid-Market leaderboard →

METRO has 5 strengths but faces 12 concerns

Key Strengths

Areas where this CU excels compared to peers

  • + Organic Growth Engine: Top 97.6% in tier
  • + Total Delinquency Rate (60+ days): Top 5.3% in tier
  • + Net Charge-Off Rate: Top 6.6% in tier
  • + Members Per Employee (MPE): Top 7.9% in tier
  • + Loan-to-Share Ratio: Top 9.2% in tier

Key Concerns

Areas that may need attention

  • - Efficiency Drag: Bottom 21.3% in tier
  • - Shrinking Wallet Share: Bottom 26.9% in tier
  • - Liquidity Strain: Bottom 46.1% in tier
  • - Deposit Outflow: Bottom 50.0% in tier
  • - Credit Quality Pressure: Bottom 80.5% in tier
  • - Indirect Auto Dependency: Bottom 82.0% in tier
  • - ROA 0.35% below tier average
  • - Efficiency ratio 12.43% above tier (higher cost structure)
  • - Net Interest Margin (NIM): Bottom 5.3% in tier
  • - Asset Growth Rate: Bottom 7.9% in tier
  • - Loan Growth Rate: Bottom 7.9% in tier
  • - AMR Growth Rate: Bottom 9.2% in tier

Core Metrics

As of 2025-Q4

Metric Current vs Tier Tier Avg State Avg (MA) National Avg Tier Percentile
Members 213,040
+1.5% YoY-2.7% QoQ
-17.3K 230,353
-2.9% YoY
27,118
+2.4% YoY
33,374
+5.7% YoY
50%
Assets $3.3B
-4.1% YoY+2.1% QoQ
$-643.5M $3.9B
+0.3% YoY
$450.6M
+5.5% YoY
$561.6M
+9.7% YoY
16%
Loans $2.8B
-5.2% YoY-0.0% QoQ
$-135.8M $2.9B
-0.2% YoY
$346.1M
+3.6% YoY
$397.0M
+8.8% YoY
37%
Deposits $2.7B
-1.6% YoY+2.1% QoQ
$-633.7M $3.3B
-0.3% YoY
$377.7M
+7.2% YoY
$477.3M
+9.7% YoY
Bottom 14.5% in tier

See Your Full Scorecard

Unlock complete metrics, rankings, and AI-powered insights — always free

Tier 1
50+ financial metrics with peer benchmarks
Performance signatures (strengths & concerns)
AI-generated insights and rankings

Want to see an example first? Preview Navy Federal's scorecard →

ROA 0.4%
+54.1% YoY-3.0% QoQ
-0.4% 0.7%
+16.8% YoY
0.6%
+6.8% YoY
0.7%
+15.9% YoY
16%
NIM 2.0%
+18.8% YoY+1.6% QoQ
-1.2% 3.1%
+9.8% YoY
3.3%
+4.1% YoY
3.8%
+5.1% YoY
Bottom 3.9% in tier
Efficiency Ratio 83.8%
-2.1% YoY+0.5% QoQ
+12.4% 71.4%
-1.4% YoY
81.2%
-12.2% YoY
79.7%
-3.3% YoY
Top 10.5% in tier
Delinquency Rate 0.2%
+27.7% YoY+48.5% QoQ
-0.6 0.9%
+5.8% YoY
0.9%
+13.0% YoY
1.3%
-2.1% YoY
Bottom 5.3% in tier
Loan To Share 104.6%
-3.6% YoY-2.0% QoQ
+15.6% 88.9%
-0.2% YoY
73.5%
-2.0% YoY
67.4%
-1.7% YoY
Top 10.5% in tier
AMR $25,706
-4.9% YoY+3.8% QoQ
$-4K $29,682
+1.5% YoY
$25,262
+4.8% YoY
$19,687
+2.0% YoY
33%
CD Concentration 32.2%
-2.5% YoY-0.5% QoQ
+3.1% 29.0% 25.0% 19.8% 66%
Indirect Auto % 30.2%
-12.9% YoY-1.9% QoQ
+11.9% 18.3% 2.4% 7.8% 77%

Signature Analysis

Strengths (1)

Organic Growth Engine

growth
#241 of 247 • Top 97.6% in tier

Growing membership while maintaining profitability. Healthy fundamentals in place.

Why This Signature
Member Growth (YoY): 1.54%
(Tier: 3.43%, National: 4.32%)
but worse than tier avg
Return on Assets: 0.36%
(Tier: 0.69%, National: 0.67%)
but worse than tier avg
Indirect Auto %: 30.18%
(Tier: 18.31%, National: 7.78%)
but worse than tier avg
247 of 378 Mid-Market CUs have this signature | 913 nationally
→ No prior data (247 CUs now) | New qualifier

Concerns (6)

Efficiency Drag

risk
#20 of 90 • Bottom 21.3% in tier

High efficiency ratio (>80%) indicates elevated operating costs relative to revenue. Margin improvement opportunities may exist.

Why This Signature
Efficiency Ratio: 83.84%
(Tier: 73.53%, National: 79.67%)
worse than tier avg
ROA Change (YoY): 0.13% points
(Tier: 0.12% points, National: 0.02% points)
but better than tier avg
Member Growth (YoY): 1.54%
(Tier: 3.43%, National: 4.32%)
worse than tier avg
90 of 378 Mid-Market CUs have this signature | 633 nationally
↓ Shrinking -36 CUs YoY | Rank improving

Shrinking Wallet Share

decline
#22 of 79 • Bottom 26.9% in tier

Average member relationship declining year-over-year. Members may be moving money elsewhere or reducing engagement.

Why This Signature
AMR Growth (YoY): -4.92%
(Tier: 3.31%, National: 4.00%)
worse than tier avg
79 of 378 Mid-Market CUs have this signature | 303 nationally
↓ Shrinking -33 CUs YoY | Rank improving

Liquidity Strain

risk
#77 of 166 • Bottom 46.1% in tier

Loan demand outpacing deposits. They're bumping against liquidity limits - need funding solutions.

Why This Signature
Loan-to-Share Ratio: 104.57%
(Tier: 85.73%, National: 67.44%)
but better than tier avg
Loan Growth (YoY): -5.16%
(Tier: 6.38%, National: 111.96%)
worse than tier avg
166 of 378 Mid-Market CUs have this signature | 439 nationally
↓ Shrinking -7 CUs YoY | Rank worsening

Deposit Outflow

decline
#10 of 19 • Bottom 50.0% in tier

Members staying (>= -1% YoY) but deposits leaving. They're moving money to higher-yield competitors - rate pressure is real.

Why This Signature
Deposit Growth (YoY): -1.59%
(Tier: 6.71%, National: 13.79%)
worse than tier avg
Member Growth (YoY): 1.54%
(Tier: 3.43%, National: 4.32%)
worse than tier avg
19 of 378 Mid-Market CUs have this signature | 91 nationally
→ No prior data (19 CUs now) | New qualifier

Credit Quality Pressure

risk
#170 of 211 • Bottom 80.5% in tier

Delinquencies are rising year-over-year. Credit risk is building - they may need better underwriting tools.

Why This Signature
Delinquency Change (YoY): 0.05% points
(Tier: 0.06% points, National: 0.06% points)
but better than tier avg
211 of 378 Mid-Market CUs have this signature | 969 nationally
↓ Shrinking -59 CUs YoY | Rank improving

Indirect Auto Dependency

risk
#161 of 196 • Bottom 82.0% in tier

Significant portion of loan portfolio in indirect auto (>15%). This concentration creates dependency on dealer relationships.

Why This Signature
Asset Growth (YoY): -4.14%
(Tier: 6.83%, National: 3.54%)
worse than tier avg
Indirect Auto %: 30.18%
(Tier: 18.31%, National: 7.78%)
worse than tier avg
Member Growth (YoY): 1.54%
(Tier: 3.43%, National: 4.32%)
worse than tier avg
196 of 378 Mid-Market CUs have this signature | 745 nationally
↓ Shrinking -11 CUs YoY | Rank worsening

Metric Rankings

See how this credit union ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.

Strengths: Metrics in the top 25% (75th percentile or higher) Concerns: Metrics in the bottom 25% (25th percentile or lower)

Comparing against 76 peers in tier

Top Strengths (4 metrics)

5
Total Delinquency Rate (60+ days)
risk
Value: 0.25%
Peer Median: -
#5 of 76 Top 5.3% in 3B-5B tier
6
Net Charge-Off Rate
risk
Value: 0.12%
Peer Median: -
#6 of 76 Top 6.6% in 3B-5B tier
7
Members Per Employee (MPE)
engagement
Value: 647.538
Peer Median: -
#7 of 76 Top 7.9% in 3B-5B tier
8
Loan-to-Share Ratio
balance_sheet
Value: 104.57%
Peer Median: -
#8 of 76 Top 9.2% in 3B-5B tier

Top Weaknesses (12 metrics)

73
Net Interest Margin (NIM)
profitability
Value: 1.97%
Peer Median: -
#73 of 76 Bottom 5.3% in 3B-5B tier
71
Asset Growth Rate
growth
Value: -4.14%
Peer Median: -
#71 of 76 Bottom 7.9% in 3B-5B tier
71
Loan Growth Rate
growth
Value: -5.16%
Peer Median: -
#71 of 76 Bottom 7.9% in 3B-5B tier
70
AMR Growth Rate
growth
Value: -4.92%
Peer Median: -
#70 of 76 Bottom 9.2% in 3B-5B tier
69
Efficiency Ratio
profitability
Value: 83.84%
Peer Median: -
#69 of 76 Bottom 10.5% in 3B-5B tier
69
Deposit Growth Rate
growth
Value: -1.59%
Peer Median: -
#69 of 76 Bottom 10.5% in 3B-5B tier
67
Fee Income Per Member
profitability
Value: $111.92
Peer Median: -
#67 of 76 Bottom 13.2% in 3B-5B tier
65
Total Deposits
balance_sheet
Value: $2.68B
Peer Median: -
#65 of 76 Bottom 15.8% in 3B-5B tier
64
Return on Assets (ROA)
profitability
Value: 0.36%
Peer Median: -
#64 of 76 Bottom 17.1% in 3B-5B tier
64
Total Assets
balance_sheet
Value: $3.30B
Peer Median: -
#64 of 76 Bottom 17.1% in 3B-5B tier
Link copied to clipboard!