BlastPoint's Credit Union Scorecard
ALL ONE
Charter #66699 · MA
ALL ONE faces 8 concerns requiring attention
How does the industry compare?
What's your peer group doing?
How does MA stack up?
Key Strengths
Areas where this CU excels compared to peers
No key strengths identified
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - Institutional Decline: Bottom 3.6% in tier
- - Efficiency Drag: Bottom 6.7% in tier
- - Liquidity Strain: Bottom 14.6% in tier
- - Stagnation Risk: Bottom 65.9% in tier
- - Membership Headwinds: Bottom 65.9% in tier
- - Indirect Auto Dependency: Bottom 85.3% in tier
- - ROA 0.51% below tier average
- - Efficiency ratio 17.83% above tier (higher cost structure)
NEW · Q2 2026 RECAP
Your Quarter, Wrapped
A 35-second highlight reel of your Q2 2026 — the wins worth celebrating and the one signal worth watching, pulled straight from your scorecard data.
Q2 2026 at a glance
- One of 111 credit unions with $750M-$1B in assets nationally, and 1 of 6 that size in Massachusetts.
- Shares and deposits +0.2% year over year ($692M in shares and deposits).
- Membership: 36,538 members, -1.2% vs a year ago.
- Delinquency rate 0.27%.
- Return on assets 0.33%.
- Efficiency ratio 92.37% vs a 74.54% peer average.
- Loan-to-share ratio 91.32% vs a 82.60% peer average.
Data period: Q2 2026 NCUA call report. Animation disabled (reduced-motion preference). Full details in the metrics table below.
Core Metrics
As of 2026-Q2
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (MA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Members |
36,538
-1.2% YoY-0.2% QoQ
|
-15.9K |
52,482
+1.3% YoY
|
18,780
+3.1% YoY
|
34,678
+6.6% YoY
|
17% |
| Assets |
$880.8M
-0.3% YoY+1.9% QoQ
|
+$16.9M |
$863.9M
+0.5% YoY
|
$364.5M
+6.9% YoY
|
$593.1M
+10.2% YoY
|
58% |
| Loans |
$632.1M
-1.8% YoY+1.1% QoQ
|
+$24.3M |
$607.8M
+2.1% YoY
|
$274.7M
+7.2% YoY
|
$418.6M
+10.1% YoY
|
51% |
| Deposits |
$692.2M
+0.2% YoY-1.3% QoQ
|
$-47.7M |
$739.9M
+0.2% YoY
|
$301.2M
+8.1% YoY
|
$504.8M
+10.3% YoY
|
25% |
See Your Full Scorecard
Unlock complete metrics, rankings, and AI-powered insights — always free
✓ Check your email for the access link!
Want to see an example first? Preview Navy Federal's scorecard →
| ROA |
0.3%
+240.2% YoY-13.6% QoQ
|
-0.5% |
0.8%
+30.4% YoY
|
0.7%
+12.3% YoY
|
1.2%
+121.4% YoY
|
17% |
| NIM |
2.8%
+11.9% YoY-0.6% QoQ
|
-0.7% |
3.5%
+6.2% YoY
|
3.3%
+1.4% YoY
|
3.8%
+2.3% YoY
|
Bottom 12.6% in tier |
| Efficiency Ratio |
92.4%
+3.4% YoY+0.5% QoQ
|
+17.8% |
74.5%
-1.4% YoY
|
80.1%
-1.4% YoY
|
83.0%
-5.3% YoY
|
Bottom 0.9% in tier |
| Delinquency Rate |
0.3%
-5.7% YoY+34.2% QoQ
|
-0.5 |
0.8%
+1.0% YoY
|
0.8%
-7.5% YoY
|
1.3%
+2.6% YoY
|
Top 13.5% in tier |
| Loan To Share |
91.3%
-1.9% YoY+2.4% QoQ
|
+8.7% |
82.6%
+1.9% YoY
|
71.9%
-1.9% YoY
|
66.4%
-1.4% YoY
|
72% |
| AMR |
$36,243
+0.4% YoY-0.0% QoQ
|
+$8K |
$28,702
+0.4% YoY
|
$25,615
+4.4% YoY
|
$20,028
-0.9% YoY
|
Top 14.4% in tier |
| CD Concentration |
34.3%
-6.8% YoY-3.3% QoQ
|
+9.8% | 24.6% | 25.4% | 20.0% | 82% |
| Indirect Auto % |
19.1%
-16.5% YoY-4.7% QoQ
|
+5.5% | 13.6% | 2.4% | 7.7% | 71% |
Signature Analysis
Strengths (0)
Concerns (6)
Efficiency Drag
riskHigh efficiency ratio (>80%) indicates elevated operating costs relative to revenue. Margin improvement opportunities may exist.
Institutional Decline
declineBoth members and loans declining - the institution is contracting. Leadership is likely under pressure to reverse course.
Stagnation Risk
riskMembership shrinking at least 0.5% year-over-year. Declining member base creates long-term risk even if current operations appear healthy.
Membership Headwinds
declineMembership declining year-over-year. They need solutions to stop the bleeding before it impacts revenue.
Indirect Auto Dependency
riskSignificant portion of loan portfolio in indirect auto (>15%). This concentration creates dependency on dealer relationships.
Liquidity Strain
riskLoan demand outpacing deposits. They're bumping against liquidity limits - need funding solutions.
Metric Rankings
See how this credit union ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.
Strengths: Metrics in the top 25% (75th percentile or higher) Concerns: Metrics in the bottom 25% (25th percentile or lower)