BlastPoint's Credit Union Scorecard
BLACKHAWK COMMUNITY
Charter #66998 · WI
BLACKHAWK COMMUNITY has 3 strengths but faces 8 concerns
How does the industry compare?
What's your peer group doing?
How does WI stack up?
Key Strengths
Areas where this CU excels compared to peers
- + Relationship Depth Leader: Top 43.8% in tier
- + Net Charge-Off Rate: Top 7.2% in tier
- + Total Deposits: Top 9.9% in tier
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - Institutional Decline: Bottom 1.4% in tier
- - Efficiency Drag: Bottom 10.1% in tier
- - Stagnation Risk: Bottom 67.9% in tier
- - Membership Headwinds: Bottom 67.9% in tier
- - ROA 0.51% below tier average
- - Efficiency ratio 15.49% above tier (higher cost structure)
- - Members Per Employee (MPE): Bottom 5.4% in tier
- - First Mortgage Concentration (%): Bottom 7.2% in tier
NEW · Q2 2026 RECAP
Your Quarter, Wrapped
A 35-second highlight reel of your Q2 2026 — the wins worth celebrating and the one signal worth watching, pulled straight from your scorecard data.
Q2 2026 at a glance
- One of 111 credit unions with $750M-$1B in assets nationally, and 1 of 2 that size in Wisconsin.
- Shares and deposits +5.0% year over year ($841M in shares and deposits).
- Membership: 44,070 members, -1.4% vs a year ago.
- Delinquency rate 0.63%.
- Return on assets 0.34%.
- Efficiency ratio 90.03% vs a 74.54% peer average.
- Loan-to-share ratio 60.02% vs a 82.60% peer average.
Data period: Q2 2026 NCUA call report. Animation disabled (reduced-motion preference). Full details in the metrics table below.
Core Metrics
As of 2026-Q2
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (WI) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Members |
44,070
-1.4% YoY-0.2% QoQ
|
-8.4K |
52,482
+1.3% YoY
|
40,085
+5.1% YoY
|
34,678
+6.6% YoY
|
32% |
| Assets |
$947.3M
+5.0% YoY+1.7% QoQ
|
+$83.4M |
$863.9M
+0.5% YoY
|
$782.0M
+12.1% YoY
|
$593.1M
+10.2% YoY
|
84% |
| Loans |
$505.0M
-0.6% YoY+0.4% QoQ
|
$-102.8M |
$607.8M
+2.1% YoY
|
$600.2M
+11.1% YoY
|
$418.6M
+10.1% YoY
|
16% |
| Deposits |
$841.5M
+5.0% YoY+1.6% QoQ
|
+$101.6M |
$739.9M
+0.2% YoY
|
$658.6M
+12.2% YoY
|
$504.8M
+10.3% YoY
|
Top 10.8% in tier |
See Your Full Scorecard
Unlock complete metrics, rankings, and AI-powered insights — always free
✓ Check your email for the access link!
Want to see an example first? Preview Navy Federal's scorecard →
| ROA |
0.3%
-33.9% YoY+50.2% QoQ
|
-0.5% |
0.8%
+30.4% YoY
|
1.0%
+81.4% YoY
|
1.2%
+121.4% YoY
|
19% |
| NIM |
3.1%
-1.0% YoY+5.7% QoQ
|
-0.4% |
3.5%
+6.2% YoY
|
3.7%
+9.7% YoY
|
3.8%
+2.3% YoY
|
25% |
| Efficiency Ratio |
90.0%
+5.7% YoY-4.1% QoQ
|
+15.5% |
74.5%
-1.4% YoY
|
75.5%
-0.0% YoY
|
83.0%
-5.3% YoY
|
Bottom 3.6% in tier |
| Delinquency Rate |
0.6%
-1.0% YoY+55.1% QoQ
|
-0.2 |
0.8%
+1.0% YoY
|
0.8%
-17.5% YoY
|
1.3%
+2.6% YoY
|
53% |
| Loan To Share |
60.0%
-5.3% YoY-1.1% QoQ
|
-22.6% |
82.6%
+1.9% YoY
|
79.3%
-0.8% YoY
|
66.4%
-1.4% YoY
|
Bottom 9.0% in tier |
| AMR |
$30,554
+4.2% YoY+1.4% QoQ
|
+$2K |
$28,702
+0.4% YoY
|
$24,272
+7.8% YoY
|
$20,028
-0.9% YoY
|
66% |
| CD Concentration |
21.1%
+1.1% YoY-1.3% QoQ
|
-3.4% | 24.6% | 21.6% | 20.0% | 38% |
| Indirect Auto % |
10.1%
-16.2% YoY+3.1% QoQ
|
-3.5% | 13.6% | 8.4% | 7.7% | 54% |
Signature Analysis
Strengths (1)
Relationship Depth Leader
growthTop-tier average member relationship within peer group, with stable or growing engagement. Strong wallet share positioning.
Concerns (4)
Efficiency Drag
riskHigh efficiency ratio (>80%) indicates elevated operating costs relative to revenue. Margin improvement opportunities may exist.
Stagnation Risk
riskMembership shrinking at least 0.5% year-over-year. Declining member base creates long-term risk even if current operations appear healthy.
Institutional Decline
declineBoth members and loans declining - the institution is contracting. Leadership is likely under pressure to reverse course.
Membership Headwinds
declineMembership declining year-over-year. They need solutions to stop the bleeding before it impacts revenue.
Metric Rankings
See how this credit union ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.
Strengths: Metrics in the top 25% (75th percentile or higher) Concerns: Metrics in the bottom 25% (25th percentile or lower)