BlastPoint's Credit Union Scorecard
ST. MARY'S
Charter #67864 · MA
ST. MARY'S has 4 strengths but faces 12 concerns
How does the industry compare?
What's your peer group doing?
How does MA stack up?
Key Strengths
Areas where this CU excels compared to peers
- + Credit Quality Leader: Top 5.3% in tier
- + Organic Growth Engine: Top 28.7% in tier
- + Total Delinquency Rate (60+ days): Top 1.6% in tier
- + Net Charge-Off Rate: Top 4.6% in tier
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - Efficiency Drag: Bottom 11.5% in tier
- - Shrinking Wallet Share: Bottom 21.8% in tier
- - Credit Quality Pressure: Bottom 24.7% in tier
- - Indirect Auto Dependency: Bottom 28.2% in tier
- - Credit Risk Growth: Bottom 28.6% in tier
- - Liquidity Strain: Bottom 31.1% in tier
- - ROA 0.37% below tier average
- - Efficiency ratio 11.85% above tier (higher cost structure)
- - Total Assets: Bottom 1.0% in tier
- - Total Deposits: Bottom 1.3% in tier
- - Fee Income Per Member: Bottom 2.6% in tier
- - Net Interest Margin (NIM): Bottom 8.2% in tier
Core Metrics
As of 2025-Q3
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (MA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Members |
57,536
+4.2% YoY+1.4% QoQ
|
-41.1K |
98,678
-1.9% YoY
|
27,447
+2.6% YoY
|
33,089
+6.1% YoY
|
Bottom 11.5% in tier |
| Assets |
$1.0B
+0.5% YoY-0.5% QoQ
|
$-715.2M |
$1.7B
+0.5% YoY
|
$440.2M
+4.2% YoY
|
$547.7M
+7.8% YoY
|
Bottom 0.7% in tier |
| Loans |
$767.1M
+1.0% YoY+1.1% QoQ
|
$-466.0M |
$1.2B
+0.5% YoY
|
$341.2M
+2.4% YoY
|
$388.7M
+8.6% YoY
|
Bottom 12.2% in tier |
| Deposits |
$828.8M
+3.9% YoY+0.1% QoQ
|
$-625.5M |
$1.5B
+1.3% YoY
|
$366.8M
+5.5% YoY
|
$464.6M
+9.3% YoY
|
Bottom 1.0% in tier |
See Your Full Scorecard
Unlock complete metrics, rankings, and AI-powered insights — always free
✓ Check your email for the access link!
Want to see an example first? Preview Navy Federal's scorecard →
| ROA |
0.3%
+82.9% YoY+9.2% QoQ
|
-0.4% |
0.7%
+13.4% YoY
|
0.7%
+17.3% YoY
|
0.7%
+273.4% YoY
|
17% |
| NIM |
2.4%
+10.9% YoY+3.0% QoQ
|
-0.8% |
3.3%
+9.3% YoY
|
3.3%
+3.8% YoY
|
3.7%
+5.0% YoY
|
Bottom 7.9% in tier |
| Efficiency Ratio |
85.8%
-7.2% YoY-1.1% QoQ
|
+11.8% |
74.0%
-10.9% YoY
|
80.4%
-4.7% YoY
|
79.1%
-3.3% YoY
|
Top 7.9% in tier |
| Delinquency Rate |
0.1%
+29.4% YoY+90.5% QoQ
|
-0.7 |
0.8%
+6.1% YoY
|
0.9%
-6.0% YoY
|
1.2%
-0.9% YoY
|
Bottom 1.6% in tier |
| Loan To Share |
92.6%
-2.8% YoY+1.0% QoQ
|
+7.4% |
85.2%
-0.8% YoY
|
74.2%
-1.7% YoY
|
68.0%
-1.7% YoY
|
64% |
| AMR |
$27,737
-1.7% YoY-0.8% QoQ
|
$-1K |
$29,172
+2.8% YoY
|
$24,707
+3.7% YoY
|
$19,418
+1.3% YoY
|
52% |
| CD Concentration |
33.7%
+5.8% YoY+1.0% QoQ
|
+4.8% |
29.0%
+0.7% YoY
|
24.8%
+8.8% YoY
|
19.6%
+6.2% YoY
|
73% |
| Indirect Auto % |
29.5%
-6.8% YoY-3.1% QoQ
|
+10.8% |
18.8%
-3.0% YoY
|
2.6%
-15.5% YoY
|
7.9%
-2.9% YoY
|
74% |
Signature Analysis
Strengths (2)
Credit Quality Leader
growthBest-in-class credit quality (delinquency in bottom 25% of peer group). Conservative underwriting paying off.
Organic Growth Engine
growthGrowing membership while maintaining profitability. Healthy fundamentals in place.
Concerns (6)
Efficiency Drag
riskHigh efficiency ratio (>80%) indicates elevated operating costs relative to revenue. Margin improvement opportunities may exist.
Shrinking Wallet Share
declineAverage member relationship declining year-over-year. Members may be moving money elsewhere or reducing engagement.
Credit Quality Pressure
riskDelinquencies are rising year-over-year. Credit risk is building - they may need better underwriting tools.
Indirect Auto Dependency
riskSignificant portion of loan portfolio in indirect auto (>15%). This concentration creates dependency on dealer relationships.
Credit Risk Growth
riskLoan portfolio growing while delinquencies are rising. Expansion with deteriorating credit quality needs attention.
Liquidity Strain
riskLoan demand outpacing deposits. They're bumping against liquidity limits - need funding solutions.
Metric Rankings
See how this credit union ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.
Strengths: Metrics in the top 25% (75th percentile or higher) Concerns: Metrics in the bottom 25% (25th percentile or lower)