BlastPoint's Credit Union Scorecard

FIRST FINANCIAL OF MARYLAND

Charter #8554 · MD

Mid-Market 1B-3B
302 CUs in 1B-3B nationally 6 in MD
View Mid-Market leaderboard →

FIRST FINANCIAL OF MARYLAND has 5 strengths but faces 8 concerns

Key Strengths

Areas where this CU excels compared to peers

  • + Organic Growth Leader: Top 17.7% in tier
  • + Organic Growth Engine: Top 58.1% in tier
  • + Strong member growth: 7.8% YoY
  • + Net Worth Ratio: Top 3.6% in tier
  • + Member Growth Rate: Top 8.9% in tier

Key Concerns

Areas that may need attention

  • - Liquidity Overhang: Bottom 43.8% in tier
  • - Credit Risk Growth: Bottom 47.2% in tier
  • - Credit Quality Pressure: Bottom 52.4% in tier
  • - Efficiency Drag: Bottom 67.4% in tier
  • - Indirect Auto Dependency: Bottom 84.1% in tier
  • - ROA 0.48% below tier average
  • - Efficiency ratio 7.89% above tier (higher cost structure)
  • - Fee Income Per Member: Bottom 6.0% in tier

Core Metrics

As of 2025-Q4

Metric Current vs Tier Tier Avg State Avg (MD) National Avg Tier Percentile
Members 77,416
+7.8% YoY+0.4% QoQ
-20.0K 97,431
-2.4% YoY
34,239
+5.1% YoY
33,374
+5.7% YoY
38%
Assets $1.4B
+8.8% YoY+2.8% QoQ
$-360.3M $1.7B
+0.9% YoY
$633.8M
+10.2% YoY
$561.6M
+9.7% YoY
33%
Loans $867.5M
+7.5% YoY+0.5% QoQ
$-366.9M $1.2B
+0.5% YoY
$458.0M
+9.3% YoY
$397.0M
+8.8% YoY
22%
Deposits $1.1B
+8.7% YoY+2.9% QoQ
$-328.0M $1.5B
+0.9% YoY
$535.8M
+9.7% YoY
$477.3M
+9.7% YoY
34%

See Your Full Scorecard

Unlock complete metrics, rankings, and AI-powered insights — always free

Tier 1
50+ financial metrics with peer benchmarks
Performance signatures (strengths & concerns)
AI-generated insights and rankings

Want to see an example first? Preview Navy Federal's scorecard →

ROA 0.2%
+32.9% YoY+32.4% QoQ
-0.5% 0.7%
+20.9% YoY
0.6%
+24.3% YoY
0.7%
+15.9% YoY
Bottom 11.3% in tier
NIM 3.2%
+6.6% YoY+0.5% QoQ
-0.0% 3.3%
+9.2% YoY
3.5%
+4.9% YoY
3.8%
+5.1% YoY
46%
Efficiency Ratio 81.9%
-3.7% YoY-1.9% QoQ
+7.9% 74.1%
-9.5% YoY
79.3%
-5.8% YoY
79.7%
-3.3% YoY
83%
Delinquency Rate 0.5%
+31.7% YoY+21.3% QoQ
-0.4 0.9%
+6.2% YoY
1.3%
-2.3% YoY
1.3%
-2.1% YoY
29%
Loan To Share 76.7%
-1.1% YoY-2.3% QoQ
-8.1% 84.8%
-0.8% YoY
65.5%
+0.8% YoY
67.4%
-1.7% YoY
25%
AMR $25,820
+0.3% YoY+1.4% QoQ
$-4K $29,428
+2.4% YoY
$21,154
+5.1% YoY
$19,687
+2.0% YoY
38%
CD Concentration 28.5%
+21.0% YoY+2.7% QoQ
-0.6% 29.0% 20.4% 19.8% 49%
Indirect Auto % 15.9%
+44.9% YoY+4.9% QoQ
-2.4% 18.3% 7.3% 7.8% 50%

Signature Analysis

Strengths (2)

Organic Growth Leader

growth
#26 of 142 • Top 17.7% in tier

Attracting members (0.5-50% YoY) without heavy indirect auto dependency (<20%). Healthy, sustainable growth model.

Why This Signature
Member Growth (YoY): 7.80%
(Tier: 3.43%, National: 4.32%)
better than tier avg
Indirect Auto %: 15.87%
(Tier: 18.31%, National: 7.78%)
better than tier avg
142 of 378 Mid-Market CUs have this signature | 609 nationally
→ No prior data (142 CUs now) | New qualifier

Organic Growth Engine

growth
#144 of 247 • Top 58.1% in tier

Growing membership while maintaining profitability. Healthy fundamentals in place.

Why This Signature
Member Growth (YoY): 7.80%
(Tier: 3.43%, National: 4.32%)
better than tier avg
Return on Assets: 0.21%
(Tier: 0.69%, National: 0.67%)
but worse than tier avg
Indirect Auto %: 15.87%
(Tier: 18.31%, National: 7.78%)
better than tier avg
247 of 378 Mid-Market CUs have this signature | 913 nationally
→ No prior data (247 CUs now) | New qualifier

Concerns (5)

Liquidity Overhang

risk
#8 of 17 • Bottom 43.8% in tier

Exceptional capital position (>16%, top quartile). Strong fundamentals—opportunity to deploy capital more productively.

Why This Signature
Net Worth Ratio: 17.50%
(Tier: 11.27%, National: 14.49%)
but better than tier avg
Loan-to-Share Ratio: 76.68%
(Tier: 85.73%, National: 67.44%)
worse than tier avg
17 of 378 Mid-Market CUs have this signature | 155 nationally
→ Stable (16→17 CUs) +1 CUs YoY

Credit Risk Growth

risk
#78 of 164 • Bottom 47.2% in tier

Loan portfolio growing while delinquencies are rising. Expansion with deteriorating credit quality needs attention.

Why This Signature
Loan Growth (YoY): 7.46%
(Tier: 6.38%, National: 111.96%)
but better than tier avg
Delinquency Change (YoY): 0.12% points
(Tier: 0.06% points, National: 0.06% points)
worse than tier avg
164 of 378 Mid-Market CUs have this signature | 665 nationally
→ No prior data (164 CUs now) | New qualifier

Credit Quality Pressure

risk
#111 of 211 • Bottom 52.4% in tier

Delinquencies are rising year-over-year. Credit risk is building - they may need better underwriting tools.

Why This Signature
Delinquency Change (YoY): 0.12% points
(Tier: 0.06% points, National: 0.06% points)
worse than tier avg
211 of 378 Mid-Market CUs have this signature | 969 nationally
↓ Shrinking -59 CUs YoY | Rank improving

Efficiency Drag

risk
#61 of 90 • Bottom 67.4% in tier

High efficiency ratio (>80%) indicates elevated operating costs relative to revenue. Margin improvement opportunities may exist.

Why This Signature
Efficiency Ratio: 81.94%
(Tier: 73.53%, National: 79.67%)
worse than tier avg
ROA Change (YoY): 0.05% points
(Tier: 0.12% points, National: 0.02% points)
worse than tier avg
Member Growth (YoY): 7.80%
(Tier: 3.43%, National: 4.32%)
but better than tier avg
90 of 378 Mid-Market CUs have this signature | 633 nationally
↓ Shrinking -36 CUs YoY | Rank worsening

Indirect Auto Dependency

risk
#165 of 196 • Bottom 84.1% in tier

Significant portion of loan portfolio in indirect auto (>15%). This concentration creates dependency on dealer relationships.

Why This Signature
Asset Growth (YoY): 8.83%
(Tier: 6.83%, National: 3.54%)
but better than tier avg
Indirect Auto %: 15.87%
(Tier: 18.31%, National: 7.78%)
but better than tier avg
Member Growth (YoY): 7.80%
(Tier: 3.43%, National: 4.32%)
but better than tier avg
196 of 378 Mid-Market CUs have this signature | 745 nationally
↓ Shrinking -11 CUs YoY | New qualifier

Metric Rankings

See how this credit union ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.

Strengths: Metrics in the top 25% (75th percentile or higher) Concerns: Metrics in the bottom 25% (25th percentile or lower)

Comparing against 302 peers in tier

Top Strengths (5 metrics)

12
Net Worth Ratio
risk
Value: 17.50%
Peer Median: -
#12 of 302 Top 3.6% in 1B-3B tier
28
Member Growth Rate
growth
Value: 7.80%
Peer Median: -
#28 of 302 Top 8.9% in 1B-3B tier
65
Deposit Growth Rate
growth
Value: 8.66%
Peer Median: -
#65 of 302 Top 21.2% in 1B-3B tier
66
Members Per Employee (MPE)
engagement
Value: 418.465
Peer Median: -
#66 of 302 Top 21.5% in 1B-3B tier
70
Asset Growth Rate
growth
Value: 8.83%
Peer Median: -
#70 of 302 Top 22.8% in 1B-3B tier

Top Weaknesses (4 metrics)

285
Fee Income Per Member
profitability
Value: $110.64
Peer Median: -
#285 of 302 Bottom 6.0% in 1B-3B tier
268
Return on Assets (ROA)
profitability
Value: 0.21%
Peer Median: -
#268 of 302 Bottom 11.6% in 1B-3B tier
251
Efficiency Ratio
profitability
Value: 81.94%
Peer Median: -
#251 of 302 Bottom 17.2% in 1B-3B tier
235
Total Loans
balance_sheet
Value: $867.52M
Peer Median: -
#235 of 302 Bottom 22.5% in 1B-3B tier
Link copied to clipboard!